AUTOMATED WEEKLY REPLANNING FOR INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY OF CERVIX CANCER

被引:61
|
作者
Stewart, James [1 ]
Lim, Karen [1 ,2 ]
Kelly, Valerie [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Jason [1 ]
Brock, Kristy K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moseley, Joanne [1 ]
Cho, Young-Bin [1 ,2 ]
Fyles, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
Lundin, Anna [4 ]
Rehbinder, Henrik [4 ]
Lof, Johan [4 ]
Jaffray, David [1 ,3 ]
Milosevic, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Radiat Med Program, Ontario Canc Inst, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] RaySearch Labs AB, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Cervix cancer; IMRT; Organ motion; Adaptive replanning; Dosimetry; PELVIC RADIATION-THERAPY; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; WOMEN; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1699
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The adoption of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat cervical malignancies has been limited in part by complex organ and tumor motion during treatment. This study explores the limits of a highly adaptive, small-margin treatment scenario to accommodate this motion. In addition, the dosimetric consequences of organ and tumor motion are modeled using a combination of deformable registration and fractional dose accumulation techniques. Methods and Materials: Thirty-three cervix cancer patients had target volumes and organs-at-risk contoured on fused, pretreatment magnetic resonance computed tomography images and weekly magnetic resonance scans taken during treatment. The dosimetric impact of interfraction organ and target motion was compared for two hypothetical treatment scenarios: a 3-mm margin plan with no replanning, and a 3-mm margin plan with an automated replan performed on the updated weekly patient geometry. Results: Of the 33 patients, 24 (73%) met clinically acceptable target coverage (98% of the clinical target volume receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose) using the 3-mm margin plan without replanning. The range in dose to 98% of the clinical target volume across all patients was 7.9% of the prescription dose if no replanning was performed. After weekly replanning, this range was tightened to 2.6% of the prescription dose and all patients met clinically acceptable target coverage while maintaining organ-at-risk dose sparing. Conclusions: The dosimetric impact of anatomical motion underscores the challenges of applying IMRT to treat cervix cancer. An appropriate adaptive strategy can ensure target coverage for small-margin IMRT treatments and maintain favorable organ-at-risk dose sparing. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 358
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated weekly online replanning for IMRT of cervix cancer
    Stewart, J. M. P.
    Lim, K.
    Brock, K. K.
    Moseley, J. L.
    Xie, J.
    Lundin, A.
    Rehbinder, H.
    Fyles, A.
    Milosevic, M.
    Jaffray, D. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S18 - S18
  • [2] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for synchronous cancer of the anal canal and cervix
    Kawamoto, Terufumi
    Ito, Kei
    Shimizuguchi, Takuya
    Kito, Satoshi
    Nihei, Keiji
    Sasai, Keisuke
    Karasawa, Katsuyuki
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 16 (04) : 4512 - 4518
  • [3] Cervix carcinomas: Place of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Barillot, I.
    [J]. CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2009, 13 (6-7): : 507 - 510
  • [4] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Fischer-Valuck, Ben W.
    Rao, Yuan James
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (03) : 297 - 307
  • [5] Adaptive replanning intensity-modulated radiotherapy for choroidal metastasis of breast cancer using optical coherence tomography
    Inoue, Toshihiko
    Masai, Norihisa
    Oh, Ryoong-Jin
    Shiomi, Hiroya
    Hashida, Noriyasu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (03) : 502 - 508
  • [6] Variability in Delineation of Clinical Target Volumes for Cervix Cancer Intensity-modulated Pelvic Radiotherapy
    Fyles, A. W.
    Lim, K.
    Small, W.
    Portelance, L.
    Gaffney, D.
    Erickson, B.
    de los Santos, J.
    Ishikura, S.
    Creutzberg, C.
    Bosch, W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S83 - S84
  • [7] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Leibel, SA
    Fuks, Z
    Zelefsky, MJ
    Wolden, SL
    Rosenzweig, KE
    Alektiar, KM
    Hunt, MA
    Yorke, ED
    Hong, LX
    Amols, HI
    Burman, CM
    Jackson, A
    Mageras, GS
    LoSasso, T
    Happersett, L
    Spirou, SV
    Chui, CS
    Ling, CC
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (02): : 164 - 176
  • [8] Effectiveness of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
    Hsia, T. C.
    Tu, C. Y.
    Chen, H. J.
    Chien, C. R.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 25 (07) : 447 - 448
  • [9] Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Breast Cancer
    Coles, C. E.
    Donovan, E.
    Haviland, J.
    Yarnold, J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 25 (03) : 215 - 215
  • [10] Conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer
    Taylor, A.
    Powell, M. E. B.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 20 (06) : 417 - 425