Multicriteria evaluation applied to farm animal welfare: difficulties and solutions from the Welfare Quality® project

被引:0
|
作者
Veissier, I. [1 ]
Botreau, R. [1 ]
Perny, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Herbivores UR1213, F-63122 St Genes Champanelle, France
[2] Univ Paris 06, LIP6, F-75252 Paris, France
来源
PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES | 2010年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
AGGREGATION; PRODUCE; SCIENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
More and more often European schemes for farm certification imply the fulfillment of animal welfare. The Welfare Quality (R) project aimed at proposing an overall assessment model of animal welfare at the unit level (farm or slaughterhouse). This model relies on a multicriterion evaluation. First, 12 welfare criteria, grouped into 4 principles, were defined. After identifying the measures needed to check that an animal unit complies with the various criteria, the model was progressively constructed so as to finally classify animal units into four categories reflecting the level of animal welfare (from excellent to very poor). We used multicriteria evaluation methods, trying to avoid the pitfalls of a naive aggregation of the information (e.g. weighted sums authorizing full compensations between criteria, not compatible with the concept of welfare). Different persons (animal and social scientists, stakeholders) were consulted. They were presented virtual datasets to which they had to assign scores. The model was developed and parameterized so as to reflect their opinions. A post-hoc analysis of the results showed that the model gives the priority to animals in bad condition while also taking into account the average state of the group of animals, and that compensation between criteria are strongly limited. Following this rigorous methodology we were able to propose an evaluation of a multidimensional concept. Such an exercise requires value judgments that must be clarified and modelled. The methodology followed to construct this animal welfare assessment model could be transposed to the assessment of other multidimensional concepts like the sustainability of production systems.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 283
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Welfare Quality® project: from scientific research to on farm assessment of animal welfare
    Canali, Elisabetta
    Keeling, Linda
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 8 : 900 - 903
  • [2] Project to promote farm animal welfare
    不详
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2010, 166 (17) : 507 - 507
  • [3] International cooperation in animal welfare: The Welfare Quality® project
    Blokhuis H.J.
    [J]. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50 (Suppl 1)
  • [4] The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: Safeguarding farm animal well-being
    Blokhuis, H. J.
    Veissier, I.
    Miele, M.
    Jones, B.
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 60 (03): : 129 - 140
  • [5] Farm animal welfare
    Kipperman, Barry
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 247 (02): : 141 - 141
  • [6] Farm animal welfare
    Chamberlain, AT
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2003, 153 (08) : 248 - 248
  • [7] An evaluation of animal welfare in a farm of diary cows
    Furnaris, F.
    Mitranescu, Elena
    Tudor, L.
    Tapaloaga, Dana
    [J]. Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, Vol 62, 2005: VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2005, 62 : 134 - 137
  • [8] Corporate Reporting on Farm Animal Welfare: An Evaluation of Global Food Companies' Discourse and Disclosures on Farm Animal Welfare
    Sullivan, Rory
    Amos, Nicky
    van de Weerd, Heleen A.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [9] Farm animal welfare - practice orientated solutions.
    Petermann, S
    [J]. DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1999, 106 (04): : 160 - 163
  • [10] A method for calculating the external costs of farm animal welfare based on the Welfare Quality® Protocol
    Vissers, Luuk S. M.
    van Wagenberg, Coen P. A.
    Baltussen, Willy H. M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 4