Comparison of human lumbar disc pressure characteristics during simulated spinal manipulation vs. spinal mobilization

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Fei [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [2 ]
Feng, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Qiang [2 ]
Yang, Xianwen [3 ]
Zhang, Hui [4 ]
Han, Lei [1 ]
Min, Yaqing [1 ]
Zhao, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] PLA, Air Force Gen Hosp, Dept TCM Manipulat Orthoped, 30 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Chinese Med Sci, Dept Sinew Injury Manual Therapy Res, Wangjing Hosp, 15 Huajiadi St, Beijing 100102, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Peoples Armed Police Forces, Dept Internal Med, Guangdong Prov Corps Hosp, Guangzhou 510507, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing DCN Orthoped Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Beijing 100143, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
spinal manipulative therapy; mobilization; thrusting manipulation; lumbar spine; intervertebral disc; pressure; THERAPY; FORCES;
D O I
10.3892/mmr.2018.9591
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to investigate the differences in human lumbar intradiscal pressure (IDP) characteristics during simulated spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization. A total of 12 adult fresh lumbar spinal specimens (T12-S2) were randomly divided into two groups. The parameters of simulated spinal mobilization were as follows: Preload angle, 15 degrees (speed, 3 degrees/sec); maximum angle, 20 degrees (speed, 1 degrees/sec); and 9 N horizontal force to the L5 spinous process. The parameters of simulated spinal manipulation were as follows: Preload angle, 15 degrees (speed, 3 degrees/sec); impulse angle, 20 degrees (impulse speed, 33 degrees/sec) and 22 N horizontal force to the L5 spinous process. The maximal IDP during both techniques was greater than the initial and end pressures (P<0.01). There was no difference between the initial and end IDP (P>0.05). The maximal IDP on the rotating side was greater than that on the contralateral side during the two techniques (P<0.05). There was no difference in both initial and end IDPs between the two sides (P>0.05). There was no difference in the maximal IDP between the two techniques (P>0.05). The ascending speed of IDP during manipulation was faster than during mobilization (P<0.01), while there was no difference in the descending speed between the two techniques (P>0.05). The maximal IDP on the rotating side was greater than the contralateral side during simulated spinal mobilization and manipulation (P<0.05). The ascending speed of IDP was faster during manipulation than mobilization (P<0.01). Therefore, thrust manipulation may have more instant impact to discs than mobilization.
引用
收藏
页码:5709 / 5716
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement of in vivo lumbar intervertebral disc pressure during spinal manipulation: A feasibility study
    Lisi, Anthony J.
    O'Neill, Conor W.
    Lindsey, Derek P.
    Cooperstein, Robert
    Cooperstein, Elaine
    Zucherman, James F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2006, 22 (03) : 234 - 239
  • [2] Effects of spinal manipulation or mobilization as an adjunct to neurodynamic mobilization for lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial
    Danazumi, Musa Sani
    Nuhu, Jibril Mohammed
    Ibrahim, Shehu Usman
    Falke, Mubarak Abubakar
    Rufai, Salim Abubakar
    Abdu, Usman Garba
    Adamu, Isa Abubakar
    Usman, Musbahu Hamisu
    Frederic, Abah Daniel
    Yakasai, Abdulsalam Mohammed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2023, 31 (06) : 408 - 420
  • [3] Spinal manipulation: Risks vs. benefits
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 100 (02) : 132 - 133
  • [4] Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation - Is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?
    Ross, JK
    Bereznick, DE
    McGill, SM
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (13) : 1452 - 1457
  • [5] Comparison of Spinal and General Anesthesia in Lumbar Disc Surgery
    Kara, Inci
    Celik, Jale Bengu
    Oc, Bahar
    Apilliogullari, Seza
    Karabagli, Hakan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES-TURKISH, 2011, 28 (04): : 487 - 496
  • [6] Taming of the Testicular Pain Complicating Lumbar Disc Herniation With Spinal Manipulation
    Chu, Eric Chun Pu
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2020, 14 (04)
  • [7] A comparison of spinal anesthesia characteristics following intrathecal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine in lumbar disc surgery
    del-Rio-Vellosillo, Monica
    Javier Garcia-Medina, Jose
    Dolores Pinazo-Duran, Maria
    Abengochea-Cotania, Antonio
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (07) : 1573 - 1574
  • [8] A comparison of spinal anesthesia characteristics following intrathecal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine in lumbar disc surgery
    Ayça Sultan Şahin
    Gürkan Türker
    Ahmet Bekar
    Hülya Bilgin
    Gülsen Korfalı
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 695 - 700
  • [9] A comparison of spinal anesthesia characteristics following intrathecal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine in lumbar disc surgery
    Sahin, Ayca Sultan
    Turker, Gurkan
    Bekar, Ahmet
    Bilgin, Hulya
    Korfali, Gulsen
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (03) : 695 - 700
  • [10] A comparison of spinal anesthesia characteristics following intrathecal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine in lumbar disc surgery
    Monica del-Rio-Vellosillo
    Jose Javier Garcia-Medina
    Maria Dolores Pinazo-Duran
    Antonio Abengochea-Cotania
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 1573 - 1574