Odor evaluation of shrimp treated with different chemicals using an electronic nose and a sensory panel

被引:8
|
作者
Luzuriaga, D. A.
Korel, F.
Balaban, M. O.
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Izmir Inst Technol, Dept Food Engn, TR-35430 Izmir, Turkey
[3] Chiquita Fresh N Amer, Hollywood, FL 33316 USA
关键词
shrimp; phosphates; sulfites; bleach; electronic nose; sensory; overall quality;
D O I
10.1300/J030v16n02_06
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
An electronic nose with 12 conducting polymer sensors was used to measure odors of raw shrimp treated with different chemicals. Headless shell-on pink shrimp (Pandalus jordani) were treated with bleach (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 ppm), phosphates (0, 2, 4 and 6% w/v) and sulfites (0, 0.75, 1.25 and 2% w/v) and stored at 2 degrees C for 48 hours. Odors were evaluated by sensory panels and an electronic nose. Aerobic plate counts were performed. Discriminant function analysis was used as the pattern recognition technique to differentiate samples based on odors. Results showed that the electronic nose could discriminate differences in odor due to chemicals present in shrimp. The correct classification rates for bleach, phosphate and sulfite treated shrimp were 92.7, 95.8, and 99.2%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 75
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Odor evaluation of shrimp treated with different chemicals using an electronic nose and a sensory panel
    Luzuriaga, Diego A.
    Korel, Figen
    Balaban, Murat O.
    Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 2007, 16 (02): : 57 - 75
  • [2] Sewage odour measurements using a sensory panel and an electronic NOSE
    Stuetz, RM
    Engin, G
    Fenner, RA
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 38 (03) : 331 - 335
  • [3] The measurement of the responses to different odour intensities of 'boar taint' using a sensory panel and an electronic nose
    Annor-Frempong, IE
    Nute, GR
    Wood, JD
    Whittington, FW
    West, A
    MEAT SCIENCE, 1998, 50 (02) : 139 - 151
  • [4] Use of electronic nose and trained sensory panel in the evaluation of tomato quality
    Sinesio, F
    Di Natale, C
    Quaglia, GB
    Bucarelli, FM
    Moneta, E
    Macagnano, A
    Paolesse, R
    D'Amico, A
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2000, 80 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [5] Evaluation of Wine Aromatic Compounds by a Sensory Human Panel and an Electronic Nose
    Arroyo, Teresa
    Lozano, Jesus
    Mariano Cabellos, Juan
    Gil-Diaz, Mar
    Pedro Santos, Jose
    Horrillo, Carmen
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2009, 57 (24) : 11543 - 11549
  • [6] Triangular Test of Amanita Mushrooms by Using Electronic Nose and Sensory Panel
    Portalo-Calero, Francisco
    Arroyo, Patricia
    Ignacio Suarez, Jose
    Lozano, Jesus
    FOODS, 2019, 8 (09)
  • [7] A Flexible Electronic Nose for Odor Discrimination Using Different Methods of Classification
    Chilo, Jose
    Horvath, Gyorgy
    Lindblad, Thomas
    Olsson, Roland
    Redeby, Johan
    Rocraade, Johan
    2009 16TH IEEE-NPSS REAL TIME CONFERENCE, 2009, : 317 - 320
  • [8] Evaluation of unpleasant odor with a portable electronic nose
    Fuchs, S.
    Strobel, P.
    Siadat, M.
    Lumbreras, M.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-BIOMIMETIC AND SUPRAMOLECULAR SYSTEMS, 2008, 28 (5-6): : 949 - 953
  • [9] COMPARISON OF COFFEE SPECIES BY SENSORY PANEL AND ELECTRONIC NOSE
    Vietoris, Vladimir
    Zajac, Peter
    Capla, Jozef
    Mendelova, Andrea
    Krizanova, Kamila
    Benesova, Lucia
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY BIOTECHNOLOGY AND FOOD SCIENCES, 2015, 5 (03): : 234 - 237
  • [10] Odor Profile of Four Cultivated and Freeze-Dried Edible Mushrooms by Using Sensory Panel, Electronic Nose and GC-MS
    Gomez, Inmaculada
    Lavega Gonzalez, Rebeca
    Tejedor-Calvo, Eva
    Perez Clavijo, Margarita
    Carrasco, Jaime
    JOURNAL OF FUNGI, 2022, 8 (09)