The prospective validation of the Modified Physiological Triage Tool (MPTT): an evidence-based approach to major incident triage

被引:7
|
作者
Vassallo, James [1 ,2 ]
Horne, S. [3 ]
Smith, J. E. [3 ,4 ]
Wallis, L. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Div Emergency Med, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Inst Naval Med, Gosport PO12 2DL, Hants, England
[3] Derriford Hosp, Emergency Dept, Plymouth, Devon, England
[4] Royal Ctr Def Med, Acad Dept Mil Emergency Med, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
PATIENTS MULTICENTER COHORT; SYSTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; INCREASED MORTALITY; 110; MMHG; BOMBINGS; TRAUMA; UK;
D O I
10.1136/jramc-2017-000771
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Triage is a key principle in the effective management of major incidents. There is limited evidence to support existing triage tools, with a number of studies demonstrating poor performance at predicting the need for a life-saving intervention. The Modified Physiological Triage Tool (MPTT) is a novel triage tool derived using logistic regression, and in retrospective data sets has shown optimum performance at predicting the need for life-saving intervention. Materials and methods Physiological data and interventions were prospectively collected for consecutive adult patients with trauma (> 18 years) presenting to the emergency department at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan, between March and September 2011. Patients were considered priority 1 (P1) if they received one or more interventions from a previously defined list. Patients were triaged using existing triage tools and the MPTT. Performance was measured using sensitivity and specificity, and a McNemar test with Bonferroni calculation was applied for tools with similar performance. Results The study population comprised 357 patients, of whom 214 (59.9%) were classed as P1. The MPTT (sensitivity: 83.6%, 95% CI 78.0% to 88.3%; specificity: 51.0%, 95% CI 42.6% to 59.5%) outperformed all existing triage tools at predicting the need for lifesaving intervention, with a 19.6% absolute reduction in undertriage compared with the existing Military Sieve. The improvement in undertriage comes at the expense of overtriage; rates of overtriage were 11.6% higher with the MPTT than the Military Sieve. Using a McNemar test, a statistically significant (p<0.001) improvement in overall performance was demonstrated, supporting the use of the MPTT over the Military Sieve. Discussion and conclusions The MPTT outperforms all existing triage tools at predicting the need for life-saving intervention, with the lowest rates of undertriage while maintaining acceptable levels of overtriage. Having now been validated on both military and civilian cohorts, we recommend that the major incident community consider adopting the MPTT for the purposes of primary triage.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 387
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The civilian validation of the Modified Physiological Triage Tool (MPTT): an evidence-based approach to primary major incident triage
    Vassallo, James
    Smith, Jason
    Bouamra, Omar
    Lecky, Fiona
    Wallis, Lee A.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (12) : 810 - 815
  • [2] Major incident triage: Derivation and comparative analysis of the Modified Physiological Triage Tool (MPTT)
    Vassallo, James
    Beavis, John
    Smith, Jason E.
    Wallis, Lee A.
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 (05): : 992 - 999
  • [3] Major incident triage and the implementation of a new triage tool, the MPTT-24
    Vassallo, James
    Smith, J. E.
    Wallis, L. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ARMY MEDICAL CORPS, 2018, 164 (02) : 103 - 106
  • [4] Triage and the Modified Physiological Triage Tool-24 (MPTT-24)
    Vassallo, James
    Horne, S.
    Smith, J. E.
    [J]. BMJ MILITARY HEALTH, 2020, 166 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [5] Ten second triage: A novel and pragmatic approach to major incident triage
    Vassallo, J.
    Cowburn, P.
    Park, C.
    Bull, D.
    Harris, S.
    Moran, C. G.
    Smith, J. E.
    [J]. TRAUMA-ENGLAND, 2024, 26 (01): : 3 - 6
  • [6] Development of a major incident triage tool: the importance of evidence from implementation studies
    Marsden, Max E. R.
    Mossadegh, S.
    Marsh, W.
    Tai, N.
    [J]. BMJ MILITARY HEALTH, 2020, 166 (03) : 204 - 204
  • [7] Mass-Casualty Triage: Time for an Evidence-Based Approach
    Jenkins, Jennifer Lee
    McCarthy, Melissa L.
    Sauer, Lauren M.
    Green, Gary B.
    Stuart, Stephanie
    Thomas, Tamara L.
    Hsu, EdbertB.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [8] An evidence-based checklist for melanoma patient triage
    Koogler, Andrew T.
    Mostow, Eliot N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 69 (02) : e45 - e46
  • [9] New NHS Prehospital Major Incident Triage Tool: from MIMMS to MITT
    Vassallo, James
    Moran, Chris G.
    Cowburn, Philip
    Smith, Jason
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2022, 39 (11) : 800 - 802
  • [10] The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START): A prospective validation study
    Ebker-White, Anja A.
    Bein, Kendall J.
    Dinh, Michael M.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2018, 30 (04) : 511 - 516