Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials in Otorhinolaryngologic Literature - Adherence to the CONSORT Statement

被引:27
|
作者
Peters, Jeroen P. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hooft, Lotty [3 ]
Grolman, Wilko [1 ,2 ]
Stegeman, Inge [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Brain Ctr Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dutch Cochrane Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
MEDICAL JOURNALS; INSTRUCTIONS; ENDORSEMENT; EXPLANATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0122328
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the preferred study design when comparing therapeutical interventions in medicine. To improve clarity, consistency and transparency of reporting RCTs, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was developed. Objectives (1) To assess the quality of reports and abstracts of RCTs in otorhinolaryngologic literature by using CONSORT checklists, (2) to compare the quality of reports and abstracts of otorhinolaryngologic RCTs between the top 5 general medical journals and top 5 otorhinolaryngologic journals, and (3) to formulate recommendations for authors and editors of otorhinolaryngologic ('ENT') journals. Methods Based on 2012 ISI Web of Knowledge impact factors, the top 5 general medical and ENT journals were selected. On 25 June 2014, using a highly sensitive Cochrane RCT filter and ENT filter, possibly relevant articles since January 1st, 2010 were retrieved and relevant RCTs were selected. We assessed how many CONSORT items were reported adequately in reports and abstracts and compared the two journal types. Results Otorhinolaryngologic RCTs (n = 15) published in general medical journals reported a mean of 92.1% (95% confidence interval: 89.5%-94.7%) of CONSORT items adequately, whereas RCTs (n = 18) published in ENT journals reported a mean of 71.8% (66.7%-76.8%) adequately (p < 0.001). For abstracts, means of 70.0% (63.7%-76.3%) and 32.3% (26.6-38.0%) were found respectively (p < 0.001). Large differences for specific items exist between the two journal types. Conclusion The quality of reporting of RCTs in otorhinolaryngologic journals is suboptimal. RCTs published in general medical journals have a higher quality of reporting than RCTs published in ENT journals. We recommend authors to report their trial according to the CONSORT Statement and advise editors to endorse the CONSORT Statement and implement the CONSORT Statement in the editorial process to ensure more adequate reporting of RCTs and their abstracts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines
    Kim, Kun Hyung
    Kang, Jung Won
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Lee, Jae-Dong
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (07):
  • [2] Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: review of adherence to the CONSORT statement
    Yu Qing Huang
    Katsiaryna Traore
    Badr Ibrahim
    Maida J. Sewitch
    Lily H. P. Nguyen
    [J]. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 47
  • [3] Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: review of adherence to the CONSORT statement
    Huang, Yu Qing
    Traore, Katsiaryna
    Ibrahim, Badr
    Sewitch, Maida J.
    Nguyen, Lily H. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2018, 47
  • [4] Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials evaluating herbal interventions: Implementing the CONSORT statement
    Gagnier, J. J.
    Boon, H.
    Rochon, P.
    Maher, D.
    Barnes, J.
    Bombardier, C.
    [J]. PLANTA MEDICA, 2008, 74 (03) : 318 - 318
  • [5] Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement
    Begg, C
    Cho, M
    Eastwood, S
    Horton, R
    Moher, D
    Olkin, I
    Pitkin, R
    Rennie, D
    Schulz, KF
    Simel, D
    Stroup, DF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08): : 637 - 639
  • [6] Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials evaluating herbal interventions: Implementing the consort statement
    Gagnier, J. J.
    Boon, H.
    Rochon, P.
    Moher, D.
    Barnes, J.
    Bombardier, C.
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2006, 29 (10) : 958 - 958
  • [7] Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials for vitamin D supplementation in autoimmune thyroid disorders based on the CONSORT statement
    Christos, Vrysis
    Eirini, Beneki
    Elias, Zintzaras
    Chrysoula, Doxani
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2023, 80 (02) : 346 - 354
  • [8] Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials for vitamin D supplementation in autoimmune thyroid disorders based on the CONSORT statement
    Christos Vrysis
    Eirini Beneki
    Elias Zintzaras
    Chrysoula Doxani
    [J]. Endocrine, 2023, 80 : 346 - 354
  • [9] The quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in the dermatology literature in an era where the CONSORT statement is a standard
    Kim, D. Y.
    Park, H. S.
    Cho, S.
    Yoon, H. S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 180 (06) : 1361 - 1367
  • [10] Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement
    Begg, C
    Cho, M
    Eastwood, S
    Horton, R
    Moher, D
    Olki, I
    Pitkin, R
    Rennie, D
    Schulz, F
    Simel, D
    Stroup, D
    Amer, J
    [J]. MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 1997, 92 (11) : 675 - 679