Privatisation and the unusual case of Belarusian accession to the WTO

被引:5
|
作者
Balistreri, Edward J. [1 ]
Olekseyuk, Zoryana [2 ]
Tarr, David G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] German Dev Inst, Bonn, Germany
[3] World Bank, North Bay Village, FL USA
来源
WORLD ECONOMY | 2017年 / 40卷 / 12期
关键词
endogenous productivity; foreign direct investment; privatisation; services liberalisation; WTO accession; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; MODELING SERVICES LIBERALIZATION; MANUFACTURING FIRMS EVIDENCE; TRADE; BARRIERS; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY; DIFFERENTIATION; INSTITUTIONS; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1111/twec.12520
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The accession negotiations of Belarus to the WTO are unusual since, due to its obligations in the Eurasian Economic Union, WTO accession is not expected to impact its tariffs or formerly substantial trade-distorting agricultural subsidies. Nonetheless, we estimate that WTO accession will increase welfare by 9.9% of consumption in Belarus. We show that inclusion of: (i) foreign direct investment; (ii) reduction in non-discriminatory barriers against services providers; and (iii) our model with imperfect competition and endogenous productivity effects together produce estimated gains eleven times larger than a model of perfect competition with only cross-border trade in services. Our analysis is enabled by our production of a data set on both discriminatory and non-discriminatory barriers in services and their ad valorem equivalents. Based on a new data set on labour productivity by sector and type of ownership, in our central model, we estimate that privatisation will increase welfare by 35.8% of consumption. We find substantial variance in the estimated gains from privatisation depending on model assumptions, but all the estimates of the impacts of privatisation indicate substantial welfare gains.
引用
收藏
页码:2564 / 2591
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Handbook on Accession to the WTO
    Charnovitz, Steve
    [J]. WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2008, 7 (04) : 712 - 713
  • [2] WTO accession issues
    Langhammer, RJ
    Lücke, M
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 1999, 22 (06): : 837 - 873
  • [3] Reducing Tariffs According to WTO Accession Rules: The Case of Vietnam
    Fosse, Henrik Barslund
    Raimondos-Moller, Pascalis
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 16 (02) : 331 - 341
  • [4] GATT/WTO accession and productivity
    Li, DD
    Wu, CQ
    [J]. GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY IN EAST ASIA, 2004, 13 : 109 - 148
  • [5] China's Accession to the WTO
    LI WUZHOU
    [J]. China Today, 2009, (10) : 40 - 40
  • [7] The Diplomacy of WTO Accession Preface
    Lee, Donna
    Ullrich, Heidi
    [J]. HAGUE JOURNAL OF DIPLOMACY, 2009, 4 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [8] The Belarusian SSR's Accession to the UN and the Diplomacy of A.A. Gromyko
    Miazga, N.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY EUROPE-SOVREMENNAYA EVROPA, 2019, (06): : 194 - 205
  • [9] Accession to the WTO: The Polish way
    Michalek, JJ
    [J]. POLISH EXPERIENCE OF TRANSITION: ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PROBLEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 4 : 73 - +
  • [10] Democracy and Accession to GATT/WTO
    Wong, Ka-fu
    Yu, Miaojie
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2015, 19 (04) : 843 - 859