Early Response Assessment in Advanced Stage Melanoma Treated with Combination Ipilimumab/Nivolumab

被引:1
|
作者
Ma, Vincent T. [1 ,2 ]
Perera, Alahendra A. Chamila [3 ]
Sun, Yilun [3 ,4 ]
Sitto, Merna [5 ]
Waninger, Jessica J. [4 ,5 ]
Warrier, Govind [6 ]
Green, Michael D. [4 ,7 ]
Fecher, Leslie A. [2 ]
Lao, Christopher D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol Med Oncol & Palliat Care, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Med Educ, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Hosp Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
melanoma; biomarker; radiological assessment; combination immune checkpoint therapy; ipilimumab and nivolumab; early response assessment; immune related adverse effects; NIVOLUMAB PLUS IPILIMUMAB; OUTCOMES; CHEMOTHERAPY; PREDICTION; GUIDELINES; CRITERIA; TIME;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2022.860421
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
BackgroundStandard combination ipilimumab/nivolumab (I/N) is given as 4 induction doses for advanced stage melanoma followed by nivolumab single-agent maintenance therapy. While many patients receive less than 4 doses due to immune-related toxicities, it is unclear if fewer doses of I/N may still provide long term clinical benefit. Our aim is to determine if response assessment after 1 or 2 doses of I/N can predict long-term survival and assess if fewer doses of I/N can lead to similar survival outcomes. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients with advanced melanoma who w0ere treated with standard I/N. Cox regression of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) models were performed to assess the relationship between response after 1 or 2 doses of I/N and risk of progression and/or death. Clinical benefit response (CBR) was assessed, defined as SD (stable disease) + PR (partial response) + CR (complete response) by imaging. Among patients who achieved a CBR after 1 or 2 doses of I/N, a multivariable Cox regression of survival was used to compare 1 or 2 vs 3 or 4 doses of I/N adjusted by known prognostic variables in advanced melanoma. Results199 patients were evaluated. Patients with CBR after 1 dose of I/N had improved PFS (HR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.33; p<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.12, 0.05-0.32; p<0.001) compared to progressive disease (PD). Patients with CBR (vs PD) after 2 doses of I/N also had improved PFS (HR: 0.09, 0.05-0.16; p<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.07, 0.03-0.14; p<0.001). There was no survival risk difference comparing 1 or 2 vs 3 or 4 doses of I/N for PFS (HR: 0.95, 0.37-2.48; p=0.921) and OS (HR: 1.04, 0.22-4.78; p=0.965). ConclusionsEarly interval imaging with response during induction with I/N may be predictive of long-term survival in advanced stage melanoma. CBR after 1 or 2 doses of I/N is associated with favorable survival outcomes, even in the setting of fewer I/N doses received. Further studies are warranted to evaluate if electively administering fewer combination I/N doses despite tolerance in select patients may balance the benefits of therapy while decreasing toxicities.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefit of the nivolumab and ipilimumab combination in pretreated advanced melanoma
    Tetu, Pauline
    Mangana, Joanna
    Dummer, Reinhard
    Dutriaux, Caroline
    Beneton, Nathalie
    Dalle, Stephane
    Meyer, Nicolas
    Oriano, Bastien
    Michielin, Olivier
    Lebbe, Celeste
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 93 : 147 - 149
  • [2] Improved clinical response in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab compared to ipilimumab alone
    Hodi, F. Stephen
    Postow, Michael A.
    Chesney, Jason
    Pavlick, Anna C.
    Robert, Caroline
    Grossmann, Kenneth
    McDermott, David
    Linette, Gerald
    Meyer, Nicolas
    Giguere, Jeffrey
    Agarwala, Sanjiv S.
    Shaheen, Montaser
    Emstoff, Marc S.
    Minor, David R.
    Salama, April
    Taylor, Matthew H.
    Rollin, Linda
    Horak, Christine
    Gagnier, Paul
    Wolchok, Jedd D.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [3] Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
    Ryu, Hyewon
    Lee, Hyo Jin
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (25): : 2503 - 2503
  • [4] Neoadjuvant Ipilimumab/Nivolumab combination in locally advanced or oligometastatic melanoma
    Ferrucci, Pier Francesco
    Lanfrancone, Luisa
    Mazzarella, Luca
    Nezi, Luigi
    Duso, Bruno Achutti
    Manzo, Teresa
    Lotti, Fiorenza
    Gandini, Sara
    Orsolini, Gianmarco
    Pennacchioli, Elisabetta
    Gnagnarella, Patrizia
    Fierro, Maria Teresa
    Senetta, Rebecca
    Riviello, Concetta
    Caliendo, Virginia
    Quaglino, Pietro
    Mazzarol, Giovanni
    Bonizzi, Giuseppina
    Cocorocchio, Emilia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (SUPPL 1)
  • [5] Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab for the treatment of melanoma
    Somasundaram, Rajasekharan
    Herlyn, Meenhard
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2015, 15 (10) : 1135 - 1141
  • [6] HEALTHCARE COST COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF NIVOLUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH IPILIMUMAB VERSUS NIVOLUMAB MONOTHERAPY AND IPILIMUMAB MONOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED MELANOMA
    Potluri, R.
    Bhandari, H.
    Ranjan, S.
    Moshyk, A.
    Kotapati, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S72 - S73
  • [7] Pathology of durable stable disease in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, or ipilimumab, and nivolumab combination therapy.
    Buchbinder, Elizabeth Iannotti
    Pfaff, Kathleen L.
    Manos, Michael P.
    Ouyang, Olivia
    Ott, Patrick Alexander
    Rodig, Scott J.
    Hodi, F. Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [8] Healthcare cost comparison analysis of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab versus nivolumab monotherapy and ipilimumab monotherapy in advanced melanoma
    Potluri, Ravi
    Ranjan, Sandip
    Bhandari, Hitesh
    Johnson, Helen
    Moshyk, Andriy
    Kotapati, Srividya
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [9] Healthcare cost comparison analysis of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab versus nivolumab monotherapy and ipilimumab monotherapy in advanced melanoma
    Ravi Potluri
    Sandip Ranjan
    Hitesh Bhandari
    Helen Johnson
    Andriy Moshyk
    Srividya Kotapati
    [J]. Experimental Hematology & Oncology, 8
  • [10] Neoadjuvant pepinemab in combination with nivolumab and/or ipilimumab in resectable stage III melanoma
    Lowe, M.
    Yushak, M. L.
    Olson, B.
    Mokhtari, A.
    Harutyunyan, A.
    Delman, K.
    Parker, D.
    Evans, E.
    Fisher, T.
    Lesinski, G.
    Kudchadkar, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S906 - S906