Efficient entry, monopoly, and the Universal Service Obligation in postal service

被引:23
|
作者
Crew, MA
Kleindorfer, PR
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Res Regulated Ind, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Public Finance; Industrial Organization; Reserve Area; Potential Entrant; Postal Provider;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008088017364
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the nature of and justification for the Universal Service Obligation (USO) and its relationship to the Reserved Area for Postal Service. This is motivated by problems of funding the USO in the face of increasing competition in the postal sector. After reviewing various approaches to defining and funding the USO, we develop a model to consider the optimal scope of both the Reserved Area and the USO. The model assumes an incumbent postal provider and potential entrants. The incumbent is guaranteed a monopoly franchise for services in its Reserved Area R and offers services in a possibly larger set of services U at uniform prices. All services not in R face competition from entrants. We characterize the welfare-optimal scope of R and U subject to a breakeven constraint for the incumbent. implications for USO policy are discussed in light of the results of the analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 125
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient Entry, Monopoly, and the Universal Service Obligation in Postal Service
    Michael A. Crew
    Paul R. Kleindorfer
    [J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1998, 14 : 103 - 126
  • [2] Multi-National Policies for the Universal Service Obligation in the Postal Sector under Entry
    Crew, Michael A.
    Kleindorfer, Paul R.
    [J]. REVIEW OF NETWORK ECONOMICS, 2008, 7 (02) : 188 - 206
  • [3] Social costs and benefits of the universal service obligation in the postal market
    Cremer, Helmuth
    De Donder, Philippe
    Boldron, Francois
    Joram, Denis
    Roy, Bernard
    [J]. COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE POSTAL AND DELIVERY SECTOR, 2008, : 23 - 35
  • [4] Reforming the Postal Universal Service
    Gautier, Axel
    Poudou, Jean-Christophe
    [J]. REVIEW OF NETWORK ECONOMICS, 2014, 13 (04) : 453 - 477
  • [5] UNIVERSAL SERVICE - OBLIGATION OR OPPORTUNITY
    BLACKMAN, CR
    [J]. TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 1995, 19 (03) : 171 - 176
  • [6] Natural monopoly myths: Lessons for postal service
    DiLorenzo, TJ
    [J]. LAST MONOPOLY: PRIVATIZING THE POSTAL SERVICE FOR THE INFORMATION AGE, 1996, : 63 - 75
  • [7] Weighing the universal service obligation: introducing rural well-being as a consideration in the viability of the United States Postal Service
    Fortunato, Michael W. -P.
    Alter, Theodore R.
    Bridger, Jeffrey C.
    Schramm, Kathleen A.
    Montopoli, Lina A.
    [J]. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 44 (02) : 200 - 221
  • [8] The last monopoly: Privatizing the postal service for the information age
    Marino, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POPULAR CULTURE, 1997, 31 (01): : 219 - 221
  • [9] Universal Service Obligation in the Age of Broadband
    Prasad, Rohit
    [J]. INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2013, 29 (04): : 227 - 233
  • [10] An incentive regime for quality of service of universal service providers in the postal sector
    da Silva, Luis Correia
    Mautino, Leonardo
    Dudley, Paul
    Payling, Elizabeth
    [J]. COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE POSTAL AND DELIVERY SECTOR, 2008, : 232 - 246