Has China's Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy Improved Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity?

被引:16
|
作者
Yu, Zhuohui [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Shiping [1 ]
Lin, Qingning [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Econ & Dev, 12 South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest Normal Univ, Coll Econ, 967 East Rd, Lanzhou 730071, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 09期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon emission trading pilot; agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP); PSM-DID model; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; GROWTH; COMPETITIVENESS; SUSTAINABILITY; INNOVATION; COUNTRIES; SECTOR;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture12091444
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The carbon trading system affects all aspects of the economy and society profoundly. Agriculture, as a high-carbon-emitting industry, has been hard-hit. China's agricultural activities will emit about 820 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, accounting for 7% of the country's total carbon emissions. In order to develop a green and low-carbon economy and control greenhouse gas emissions, China officially launched the pilot carbon emissions trading policy in 2013. The effects and mechanism of this on agricultural carbon emissions are still unclear. Herein, this paper uses China's provincial panel data from 2000 to 2019 to measure agricultural green total factor productivity regarding the implementation of China's carbon emissions trading pilot policy in 2013 as a quasinatural experiment, and uses PSM-DID robustness analysis to evaluate the effect of China's carbon emission rights trading pilot policy on agricultural green total factor productivity in pilot areas. The propensity score method is a type of statistical method that uses nonexperimental or observational data for intervention-effect analysis, which reduces the effects of bias and allows for more reasonable comparisons between treatment and control groups. "Difference in difference" is an approach to policy-effect evaluation based on a counterfactual framework to assess the change in the observed factors in both cases of policy occurrence and nonoccurrence. PSM-DID is a combination of PSM and DID using the PSM method to match each treatment group sample to a specific control group sample, which can solve the problem of self-selection bias in the DID method and assess the policy implementation effect more accurately. This study found that China's carbon emissions trading pilot policy has significantly improved China's agricultural green total factor productivity. Further impact mechanism tests show that China's carbon emissions trading pilot policy will improve agricultural green total factor productivity through environmental protection policies and technological innovation. Finally, this paper puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions based on the research results.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Has the pilot carbon trading policy improved China's green total factor energy efficiency?
    Zhou, Chaobo
    Qi, Shaozhou
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 114
  • [2] Impact of carbon trading on agricultural green total factor productivity in China
    Yu, Daisong
    Liu, Linxin
    Gao, Shanhong
    Yuan, Shiyu
    Shen, Qianling
    Chen, Haipeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 367
  • [3] Has the pilot carbon trading policy improved China's green total factor energy efficiency? (vol 114, 106268, 2022)
    Zhou, Chaobo
    Qi, Shaozhou
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 128
  • [4] Has China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy improved green investment in carbon-intensive enterprises?
    Zhang, Yue-Jun
    Shi, Wei
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 180
  • [5] Carbon Emissions Trading Prices and Total Factor Productivity:Evidence from China
    Wu X.-P.
    [J]. Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (04): : 1926 - 1937
  • [6] The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on green total-factor productivity in China’s cities
    Ke-Liang Wang
    Jin Li
    Ru-Yu Xu
    Su-Qin Pang
    Zhuang Miao
    Hua-Ping Sun
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 24299 - 24318
  • [7] The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on green total-factor productivity in China's cities
    Wang, Ke-Liang
    Li, Jin
    Xu, Ru-Yu
    Pang, Su-Qin
    Miao, Zhuang
    Sun, Hua-Ping
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (09) : 24299 - 24318
  • [8] Have China's Pilot Free Trade Zones Improved Green Total Factor Productivity?
    Ma, Qingshan
    Zhang, Yuanmeng
    Yang, Kexin
    He, Lingyun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (21)
  • [9] Is carbon emission trading policy a panacea? The implications of promoting green total factor productivity
    Hui, Zhangting
    Choi, Chang Hwan
    [J]. ASIAN-PACIFIC ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2024,
  • [10] Can the Carbon Emissions Trading System Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of the Pilot Cities?-A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Econometric Analysis in China
    Huang, Dawei
    Chen, Gang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)