Rationale and design of an evidence-based tool to guide preoperative evaluation and management

被引:0
|
作者
Campbell, Alex R. [1 ]
Ingham, David P. [1 ]
Shepherd, Michele F. [1 ]
Mueller, Joshua J. [1 ]
Henry, Timothy D. [1 ]
Sharkey, Scott W. [1 ]
Cummings, Michael K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Abbott NW Hosp, 800 E 28th St, Minneapolis, MN 55407 USA
关键词
Preoperative; Evaluation; Standardisation; Value; Safety; Clinical decision making;
D O I
10.1177/1750458920929213
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In the United States, over-testing and over-treatment are recognised causes of excess cost and patient harm. Healthcare value, defined as health outcomes achieved relative to the costs of care, has become a focus to improve the quality and affordability of healthcare. Aim: To describe the rationale for, and development of a standardised clinical preoperative decision-support tool. Program description: An evidence-based, preoperative clinical decision tool was developed to guide preoperative testing and management of high-risk medications. Program evaluation: Patient data before and after implementation of the tool will be analysed to determine its effectiveness in reducing preoperative testing. Discussion: Preoperative testing is an area that presents an opportunity to increase healthcare value and decrease healthcare spending. Guidelines are available to standardise preoperative assessment but their adoption and acceptance into practice has been slow. To systematise preoperative assessment within our healthcare system, we reviewed current published literature and guidelines and synthesised them into an electronic, evidence-based, decision-support tool. After distribution of the tool to clinicians in our healthcare system, we will assess its impact on healthcare value, costs and outcomes. We believe that an evidence-based preoperative tool, seamlessly and efficiently integrated into clinician workflow, can improve preoperative patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 30
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence-based preoperative evaluation
    Solca, Maurizio
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) : 231 - 236
  • [2] Preoperative evaluation for gynecologic surgery: a guide to judicious, evidence-based testing
    Shields, Jessica
    Lupo, Andrew
    Walsh, Teresa
    Kho, Kimberly
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 30 (04) : 252 - 259
  • [3] Evidence-Based Software Portfolio Management: A Tool Description and Evaluation
    Huijgens, Hennie
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING 2016 (EASE '16), 2016,
  • [4] Evidence-based preoperative evaluation of candidates for thoracotomy
    Reilly, JJ
    [J]. CHEST, 1999, 116 (06) : 474S - 476S
  • [5] A Reader’s Guide to Evidence-Based Management
    Eric Barends
    [J]. Controlling & Management Review, 2016, 60 (1) : 36 - 40
  • [6] Knowledge Modeling Tool for Evidence-Based Design
    Durmisevic, Sanja
    Ciftcioglu, Oezer
    [J]. HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2010, 3 (03) : 101 - 123
  • [7] A randomized trial of Evidence-based OutReach (EBOR): Rationale and design
    Freemantle, N
    Eccles, M
    Wood, J
    Mason, J
    Nazareth, I
    Duggan, C
    Young, P
    Haines, A
    Drummond, M
    Russell, I
    Walley, T
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 20 (05): : 479 - 492
  • [8] Postoperative Pain Management: An Evidence-Based Guide to Practice
    Gelinas, Celine
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2007, 39 (02) : 109 - 111
  • [9] Sessile Serrated Adenomas: An Evidence-Based Guide to Management
    Crockett, Seth D.
    Snover, Dale C.
    Ahnen, Dennis J.
    Baron, John A.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 13 (01) : 11 - +
  • [10] Evidence-based cesarean delivery: preoperative management (part 7)
    Mackeen, A. Dhanya
    Sullivan, Maranda, V
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (05)