How to play the ultimatum game:: An engineering approach to metanormativity

被引:3
|
作者
Hardy-Vallee, Benoit [1 ]
Thagard, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Philosophy, Toronto, ON M5S 1A2, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Philosophy, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
decision; naturalism; neuroeconomics; normativity; rationality;
D O I
10.1080/09515080801976581
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The ultimatum game is a simple bargaining situation where the behavior of people frequently contradicts the optimal strategy according to classical game theory. Thus, according to many scholars, the commonly observed behavior should be considered irrational. We argue that this putative irrationality stems from a wrong conception of metanormativity (the study of norms about the establishment of norms). After discussing different metanormative conceptions, we defend a Quinean, naturalistic approach to the evaluation of norms. After reviewing empirical literature on the ultimatum game, we argue that the common behavior in the ultimatum game is rational and justified. We therefore suggest that the norms of economic rationality should be amended.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 192
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条