Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation

被引:12
|
作者
Kimura, Mitsutoshi [1 ]
Nawata, Kan [1 ,2 ]
Kinoshita, Osamu [1 ]
Yamauchi, Haruo [1 ]
Hoshino, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Hatano, Masaru [3 ,4 ]
Amiya, Eisuke [3 ]
Kashiwa, Koichi [5 ]
Endo, Miyoko [6 ]
Kagami, Yukie [6 ]
Nemoto, Mariko [6 ]
Ono, Minoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Cardiac Surg, Bunkyo Ku, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Healthcare Qual Assessment, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Dept Therapeut Strategy Heart Failure, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Med Engn, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Div Organ Transplantat Serv, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Left ventricular assist device; Continuous flow; Readmission; Driveline infection; OSAKA-UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEARTMATE II; JARVIK; 2000; HOSPITAL READMISSIONS; JAPANESE MULTICENTER; DESTINATION THERAPY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PUMP EXCHANGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10047-017-0975-4
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy has improved the survival of patients with advanced heart failure. However, the readmission rate of CF-LVAD patients is still relatively high. A total of 90 patients who received CF-LVADs between April 2011 and March 2016 at our institute and were discharged home were analyzed retrospectively. They were followed up through March 2017. Clinical data, including frequency, length and etiology of readmission, were obtained from medical records. The mean observation period after initial discharge was 713 +/- 322 days. In total, 73 patients (81%) had 236 readmissions, 214 unplanned and 22 planned. The overall and unplanned readmission rates were 1.34 and 1.22 per patient-year, respectively. The rate of freedom from unplanned first readmission at 1 year after initial discharge was 39%. The median interval between the previous hospital discharge and first and second readmissions was 311 and 213 days, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.117). The rate of readmission after more than three readmissions was significantly higher than that of first or second readmission (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The most common etiology of readmission was driveline infection (DLI) (36%), followed by stroke (9%). The median length of hospital stay due to DLI was 23 days. The patients with repeated unplanned readmissions had significantly lower EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire utility score than those with no or just one readmission. Readmission was common in CF-LVAD patients, and the most common etiology of readmissions was DLI. The interval to the next readmission seemed shorter for patients with repeated readmissions.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 317
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation
    Mitsutoshi Kimura
    Kan Nawata
    Osamu Kinoshita
    Haruo Yamauchi
    Yasuhiro Hoshino
    Masaru Hatano
    Eisuke Amiya
    Koichi Kashiwa
    Miyoko Endo
    Yukie Kagami
    Mariko Nemoto
    Minoru Ono
    [J]. Journal of Artificial Organs, 2017, 20 : 311 - 317
  • [2] Readmissions After Implantation of Axial Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Hasin, Tal
    Marmor, Yariv
    Kremers, Walter
    Topilsky, Yan
    Severson, Cathy J.
    Schirger, John A.
    Boilson, Barry A.
    Clavell, Alfredo L.
    Rodeheffer, Richard J.
    Frantz, Robert P.
    Edwards, Brooks S.
    Pereira, Naveen L.
    Stulak, John M.
    Joyce, Lyle
    Daly, Richard
    Park, Soon J.
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (02) : 153 - 163
  • [3] Readmissions Following Implantation of a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Da Silva, Matthew
    MacIver, Jane
    Rodger, Marnie
    Jaffer, M. N. Munira
    Raju, Sneha
    Billia, Filio
    Rao, Vivek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2016, 31 (05) : 361 - 364
  • [4] Hospital Readmissions After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Heim, C.
    Mekkhala, N.
    Kondruweit, M.
    Weyand, M.
    Tandler, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04): : S340 - S341
  • [5] Hospital readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Lesny, P.
    Luknar, M.
    Simovicova, V.
    Dankova, M.
    Goncalvesova, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 91 - 91
  • [6] Hospital readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Heim, Christian
    Mekkhala, Nattipong
    Kondruweit, Markus
    Weyand, Michael
    Tandler, Rene
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (07) : S41 - S41
  • [7] Readmissions After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Differences Observed Between Two Contemporary Device Types
    Haglund, Nicholas A.
    Davis, Mary E.
    Tricarico, Nicole M.
    Keebler, Mary E.
    Maltais, Simon
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2015, 61 (04) : 410 - 416
  • [8] Outcomes and Readmissions After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: Heartmate II Versus Heartware Ventricular Assist Device
    Tuncer, O. N.
    Kemaloglu, C.
    Erbasan, O.
    Golbasi, I.
    Turkay, C.
    Bayezid, O.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2016, 48 (06) : 2157 - 2161
  • [9] Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis
    Akhter, Shahab A.
    Badami, Abbasali '
    Murray, Margaret
    Kohmoto, Takushi
    Lozonschi, Lucian
    Osaki, Satoru
    Lushaj, Entela B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 100 (03): : 884 - 889
  • [10] ANALYSIS OF COST FOR READMISSIONS AFTER CONTINUOUS FLOW LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE IMPLANTATION-A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Williams, Celeste T.
    Jennings, Douglas
    Karadolian, Sevan
    Chamaria, Surbhi
    Tita, Cristina
    Nemeh, Hassan
    Morgan, Jeffrey
    Brewer, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E1018 - E1018