共 50 条
Geoengineering tensions
被引:6
|作者:
Currie, Adrian
[1
]
机构:
[1] Ctr Study Existential Risk, David Attenborough Bldg,Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3QY, England
来源:
关键词:
Scientific Goverence;
Incentives;
Geoengineering;
Moral Hazards;
SOLAR-RADIATION MANAGEMENT;
CLIMATE;
ETHICS;
MITIGATION;
GOVERNANCE;
FRAMEWORK;
D O I:
10.1016/j.futures.2018.02.002
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
There has been much discussion of the moral, legal and prudential implications of geoengineering, and of governance structures for both the research and deployment of such technologies. However, insufficient attention has been paid to how such measures might affect geoengineering in terms of the incentive structures which underwrite scientific progress. There is a tension between the features that make science productive, and the need to govern geoengineering research, which has thus far gone underappreciated. I emphasize how geoengineering research requires governance which reaches beyond science's traditional boundaries, and moreover requires knowledge which itself reaches beyond what we traditionally expect scientists to know about. How we govern emerging technologies should be sensitive to the incentive structures which drive science.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 88
页数:11
相关论文