Evidence for hormesis in mutagenicity dose-response relationships

被引:22
|
作者
Calabrese, Edward J. [1 ]
Stanek, Edward J., III [2 ]
Nascarella, Marc A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Publ Hlth Environm Hlth Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Publ Hlth Biostat & Epidemiol, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] Gradient Corp, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Mutagen; Hormetic; U-shaped; J-shaped; Dose-response; Adaptive response; THRESHOLD-MODEL; HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS; RADIATION HORMESIS; TESTS; TOXICOLOGY; BECAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.04.006
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This study assessed the occurrence of hormetic dose responses from three previously published data sets [1-3] with 825 chemicals in three Ames assay tester strains (i.e., TA97, TA98, TA100) with and without the 59 fraction, using a five dose protocol and semi-log dose spacing. Ninety-five (95) (11.5%) chemicals satisfied the multiple a priori entry criteria, with a total of 107 assays. Of the assays satisfying the entry criteria, 61 involved TA100, a strain that detects base-pair substitution mutations. 29.5% (18/61) satisfied the statistical evaluative criteria for hormesis, exceeding that predicted by chance by 4.0-fold (p < 0.001). The remaining 46 assays involved TA97 and TA98, strains that detect frameshift mutations. Of these 46 assays, the overall responses for the lowest two doses closely approximated the control response (e.g., 101.77% of the control for TA98; 99.20% for TA97). Only 2.2% (1/46) of the assays satisfied the evaluative criteria for hormesis. In conclusion, these data support a hormetic model for TA100, whereas the responses for TA97 and TA98 are consistent with a threshold dose-response model. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hormesis: The dose-response revolution
    Calabrese, EJ
    Baldwin, LA
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 43 : 175 - 197
  • [2] Can hormesis be a default for dose-response?
    Callahan, BG
    [J]. HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 24 (05) : 271 - 273
  • [3] Hormesis dose-response contaminant-induced hormesis in animals
    Rix, Rachel R.
    Guedes, Raul Narciso C.
    Cutler, G. Christopher
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 30
  • [4] Hormesis and its place in nonmonotonic dose-response relationships: Some scientific reality checks
    Mushak, Paul
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 115 (04) : 500 - 506
  • [5] Application of the In Vivo Pig-a Mutagenicity Assay for Assessing Dose-Response Relationships
    Dertinger, S. D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2011, 52 : S18 - S18
  • [6] Dose-response relationships
    Dickerson, RL
    Brouwer, A
    Gray, LE
    Grothe, DR
    Peterson, RE
    Sheehan, DM
    Sills-McMurry, C
    Wiedow, MA
    [J]. PRINCIPLES AND PROCESSES FOR EVALUATING ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION IN SILDLIFE, 1998, : 69 - 96
  • [7] The notion of hormesis and the dose-response theory:: A unified approach
    Murado, M. A.
    Vazquez, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (03) : 489 - 499
  • [8] Logistic Regression Models with Unspecified Low Dose-Response Relationships and Experimental Designs for Hormesis Studies
    Kim, Steven
    Wand, Jeffrey
    Magana-Ramirez, Christina
    Frej, Jenelle
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2021, 41 (01) : 92 - 109
  • [9] Dose-response relationships in multifunctional food design: assembling the evidence
    Aggett, Peter J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES AND NUTRITION, 2012, 63 : 37 - 42
  • [10] DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS OF ALLOPURINOL
    MERTZ, DP
    [J]. KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1988, 66 (16): : 747 - 747