Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Where We Are, and What the Future Holds

被引:2
|
作者
Rifai, Fareed [1 ]
Le, Crystal P. [1 ]
Lim, Lauren [1 ]
Zhang, Ze [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, 131 S Robertson St,12th Floor, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
MIGS; Microinvasive glaucoma surgery; Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery; Trabecular micro-bypass; Goniotomy; Canaloplasty; Trabeculotomy; ASSISTED TRANSLUMINAL TRABECULOTOMY; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; KAHOOK DUAL BLADE; AB INTERNO TRABECULECTOMY; EXCISIONAL GONIOTOMY; CIRCUMFERENTIAL TRABECULOTOMY; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; STENT IMPLANTATION; 12-MONTH OUTCOMES; CANAL-MICROSTENT;
D O I
10.1007/s40137-022-00311-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, or MIGS, has revolutionized the glaucoma surgical space in the past 15 years. The high safety profile and moderate efficacy of MIGS has enabled earlier surgical intervention for glaucoma, providing safe and sight-saving care sooner. This review aims to examine the latest evidence on available devices and techniques. Recent Findings Trabecular outflow remains a mainstay for MIGS targets, with distal outflow enhancement and alternative drainage pathways showing efficacy. Comparisons of various MIGS devices and techniques are emerging, which will enable glaucoma surgeons to better design individualized care for their patients. While no single MIGS has emerged as significantly superior to others; some MIGS may be better suited for some types of glaucoma, however. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries provide safe and effective alternatives to traditional filtering glaucoma surgeries in many patients. The high safety profile of MIGS enable earlier surgical interventions, which can improve visual outcome and patients' quality of life. There is an abundance of evidence showing the efficacy and safety of various MIGS, with innovations continuing to advance the surgical treatment of glaucoma.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 49
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Where We Are, and What the Future Holds
    Fareed Rifai
    Crystal P. Le
    Lauren Lim
    Ze Zhang
    [J]. Current Surgery Reports, 2022, 10 : 35 - 49
  • [2] Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: What Do We Know? Where Should We Go?
    Xin, Chen
    Wang, Huangzhou
    Wang, Ningli
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (05): : 1 - 10
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Where Is the Evidence?
    Gillmann, Kevin
    Mansouri, Kaweh
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 9 (03): : 203 - 214
  • [4] A decade of metaproteomics: Where we stand and what the future holds
    Wilmes, Paul
    Heintz-Buschart, Anna
    Bond, Philip L.
    [J]. PROTEOMICS, 2015, 15 (20) : 3409 - 3417
  • [5] Body MRI in pediatrics: where we are and what the future holds
    Anupindi, Sudha A.
    Dillman, Jonathan R.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [6] Minimally invasive thyroid surgery: where are we now?
    Ng, JWT
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 73 (09) : 769 - U3
  • [7] Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery—where are we going?
    Mushegh A. Sahakyan
    Knut Jørgen Labori
    Florian Primavesi
    Kjetil Søreide
    Stefan Stättner
    Bjørn Edwin
    [J]. European Surgery, 2019, 51 : 98 - 104
  • [8] Minimally Invasive Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
    Seybt, Melanie W.
    Terris, David J.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 43 (02) : 375 - +
  • [9] Leadless Pacing: Where We Currently Stand and What the Future Holds
    Rand Ibrahim
    Alexandre Khoury
    Mikhael F. El-Chami
    [J]. Current Cardiology Reports, 2022, 24 : 1233 - 1240
  • [10] Leadless Pacing: Where We Currently Stand and What the Future Holds
    Ibrahim, Rand
    Khoury, Alexandre
    El-Chami, Mikhael F.
    [J]. CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 24 (10) : 1233 - 1240