ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:94
|
作者
Morgan, John M. [1 ]
Biffi, Mauro [2 ]
Geller, Laszlo [3 ]
Leclercq, Christophe [4 ]
Ruffa, Franco [5 ]
Tung, Stanley [6 ]
Defaye, Pascal [7 ]
Yang, Zhongping [8 ]
Gerritse, Bart [9 ]
van Ginneken, Mireille [9 ]
Yee, Raymond [10 ]
Jais, Pierre [11 ]
机构
[1] Southampton Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Cardiac Rhythm Management, Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
[2] S Orsola Malpighi Univ Hosp, Bologna, Italy
[3] Semmelweis Univ, Ctr Heart, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Hosp, Rennes, France
[5] Alessandro Manzoni Hosp, Lecce, Italy
[6] Univ British Columbia, St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[7] Univ Hosp, Grenoble, France
[8] Medtronic Plc, Minneapolis, MN USA
[9] Medtronic Bakken Res Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[10] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[11] Bordeaux Univ, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
关键词
Prospective clinical trial; Left ventricular endocardial pacing; Heart failure; Safety; HEART-FAILURE; STIMULATION; EFFICACY; STROKE; TRIAL; SINUS; RISK; LEAD;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehv723
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC) study evaluated the feasibility and safety of left ventricular endocardial pacing (LVEP) using a market-released pacing lead implanted via a single pectoral access by a novel atrial transseptal lead delivery system. Methods and results ALSYNC was a prospective clinical investigation with a minimum of 12-month follow-up in 18 centres of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-indicated patients, who had failed or were unsuitable for conventional CRT. The ALSYNC system comprises the investigational lead delivery system and LVEP lead. Patients required warfarin therapy post-implant. The primary study objective was safety at 6-month follow-up, whichwas defined as freedom from complications related to the lead delivery system, implant procedure, or the lead >= 70%. The ALSYNC study enrolled 138 patients. The LVEP lead implant success rate was 89.4%. Freedom from complications meeting the definition of primary endpoint was 82.2% at 6 months (95% CI 75.6-88.8%). In the study, 14 transient ischaemic attacks (9 patients, 6.8%), 5 non-disabling strokes (5 patients, 3.8%), and 23 deaths (17.4%) were observed. No death was from a primary endpoint complication. At 6 months, the New York Heart Association class improved in 59% of patients, and 55% had LV end-systolic volume reduction of 15% or greater. Those patients enrolled after CRT non-response showed similar improvement with LVEP. Conclusions The ALSYNC study demonstrates clinical feasibility, and provides an early indication of possible benefit and risk of LVEP.
引用
收藏
页码:2118 / 2127
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing the Future for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Morgan, John M.
    Wiles, Benedict M.
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2017, 70 (01): : 14 - 15
  • [2] Feasibility of left ventricular endocardial lead pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Algazzar, Alaa Solaiman
    Taha, Mohamed Osama
    Katta, Azza Ali
    El Abbady, Asmaa
    Lotfy, Heba Abdelmoteleb
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (02): : 53 - 55
  • [3] Cardiac resynchronization therapy with wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing: is this the direction to go?
    Holubec, Tomas
    Beckers, Julius
    Holubcova, Zdenka
    Walter, Veronika
    Walther, Thomas
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2018, 8 (04) : 534 - 537
  • [4] Is endocardial left ventricular pacing better than conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Margarida Figueiredo, M.
    Paula, S.
    Santos, M.
    Santos, H.
    Coelho, M.
    Almeida, S.
    Lopes, A.
    Almeida, L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 14 - 14
  • [5] Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing in nonresponders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Sidhu, Baldeep S.
    Porter, Bradley
    Gould, Justin
    Sieniewicz, Benjamin
    Elliott, Mark
    Mehta, Vishal
    Delnoy, Peter P. H. M.
    Deharo, Jean-Claude
    Butter, Christian
    Seifert, Martin
    Boersma, Lucas V. A.
    Riahi, Sam
    James, Simon
    Turley, Andrew J.
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Betts, Timothy R.
    Niederer, Steven
    Sanders, Prashanthan
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (09): : 966 - 973
  • [6] Single site left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization
    Stevenson, WG
    Sweeney, MO
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (14) : 1694 - 1696
  • [7] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Wireless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing The SELECT-LV Study
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    Miller, Marc A.
    Neuzil, Petr
    Sogaard, Peter
    Butter, Christian
    Seifert, Martin
    Delnoy, Peter Paul
    van Erven, Lieselot
    Schalji, Martin
    Boersma, Lucas V. A.
    Riahi, Sam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (17) : 2119 - 2129
  • [8] Multisite left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Gamble, James H. P.
    Betts, Tim R.
    [J]. FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (04) : 469 - 477
  • [9] Improvement of Right Ventricular Hemodynamics with Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Hyde, Eoin R.
    Behar, Jonathan M.
    Crozier, Andrew
    Claridge, Simon
    Jackson, Tom
    Sohal, Manav
    Gill, Jaswinder S.
    O'Neill, Mark D.
    Razavi, Reza
    Niederer, Steven A.
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 39 (06): : 531 - +
  • [10] Endocardial left ventricular pacing improves cardiac resynchronization therapy in canine LBBB hearts
    van Deursen, Caroline
    van Hunnik, Arne
    Kuiper, Marion
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Echt, Debra
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 555 - 555