Determinants of integrated soil fertility management technologies adoption by smallholder farmers in the Chinyanja Triangle of Southern Africa

被引:43
|
作者
Mponela, Powell [1 ]
Tamene, Lulseged [1 ]
Ndengu, Gift [1 ]
Magreta, Ruth [4 ]
Kihara, Job [2 ]
Mango, Nelson [3 ]
机构
[1] CIAT, Chitedze Res Stn, POB,158, Lilongwe, Malawi
[2] CIAT, ICIPE Duduville Campus,POB 823-00621, Nairobi, Kenya
[3] CIAT, Concorde Bldg,Blvd Umuganda, Kacyiru 7016, Kigali, Rwanda
[4] Lilongwe Univ Agr & Nat Resources LUANAR, Bunda Coll, POB 219, Lilongwe, Malawi
关键词
ISFM choice set; Adoption; Ordered probit model; Smallholder farmers; Chinyanja triangle; DECISIONS; HIGHLANDS; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS; EASTERN;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) technologies have proven to be viable options for improving land productivity and increasing yield. However, adoption of the set of complementary technologies that are required in ISFM is quite variable and studies tend to focus on single technologies. In this study we used cluster analysis to group technologies and ordered probit to determine the probability of multiple technology adoption. The result show that usage of ISFM in the Chinyanja Triangle (Southern Africa) is grouped into 3 technological sets based on complementarities. The set of nutrient dense technologies of inorganic fertiliser, compost and animal manure (ISFMset3) indicates that they are used by farmers who face similar opportunities of having land that require minimal input, sell produce at farm gate as opposed to market, have more transport and communication facilities, and recover from livestock loss. Loss of crops, however, deter adoption of this set. The technological set comprising of fallow, rotation and grain legumes (ISFMset2) which enhances biomass accumulation and nitrogen fixation with complementary effects in cereal dominated farming system, is more likely adopted by households with land that require more inputs, are more educated, own more bicycles and have higher financial capital. Other four technologies (ISFMset1 including mulch, lime, compost and agroforestry) are used by a few individuals to address specific constraints in nutrient and water retention, and acidity. The result also indicated variations in usage of ISFMset3 between sites. These results are instrumental in identifying factors that influence adoption of a set of ISFM technologies in the Chinyanja Triangle and could be of use in targeting research and development initiatives. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 48
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simultaneous adoption of integrated soil fertility management technologies in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa
    Mponela, Powell
    Kassie, Girma T.
    Tamene, Lulseged D.
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2018, 42 (03) : 172 - 184
  • [2] Factors influencing adoption of integrated soil fertility management technologies by smallholder farmers in Ghana
    Kwadzo, Moses
    Quayson, Emmanuel
    [J]. HELIYON, 2021, 7 (07)
  • [3] Awareness and adoption of land, soil and water conservation practices in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa
    Mango, Nelson
    Makate, Clifton
    Tamene, Lulseged
    Mponela, Powell
    Ndengu, Gift
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2017, 5 (02) : 122 - 129
  • [4] Determinants of adoption and adoption intensity of integrated soil fertility management technologies among sorghum farmers in Upper Eastern Kenya
    Kiprotich, Shadrack
    Mogaka, Hezron
    Ndirangu, Samuel Njiri
    Onyari, Charles Nyambane
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 40 (01)
  • [5] DETERMINANTS OF FERTILISER USE BY SMALLHOLDER MAIZE FARMERS IN THE CHINYANJA TRIANGLE IN MALAWI, MOZAMBIQUE AND ZAMBIA
    Mapila, M. A. T. J.
    Njuki, J.
    Delve, R. J.
    Zingore, S.
    Matibini, J.
    [J]. AGREKON, 2012, 51 (01) : 21 - 41
  • [6] The Dynamics of Social Capital in Influencing Use of Soil Management Options in the Chinyanja Triangle of Southern Africa
    Njuki, Jemimah M.
    Mapila, Mariam T.
    Zingore, Shamie
    Delve, Robert
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2008, 13 (02):
  • [7] DETERMINANTS OF THE DECISION TO ADOPT INTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BY SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN THE CENTRAL HIGHLANDS OF KENYA
    Mugwe, Jayne
    Mugendi, Daniel
    Mucheru-Muna, Monicah
    Merckx, Roel
    Chianu, Jonas
    Vanlauwe, Bernard
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2009, 45 (01) : 61 - 75
  • [8] Impact of Integrated Soil Fertility Management Practices on the Welfare of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia
    Sileshi, Million
    Feyisa, Bekele Wegi
    Eshetu, Shibire Bekele
    Kadigi, Reuben M. J.
    Mutabazi, Khamaldin
    Sieber, Stefan
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2024,
  • [9] Integrated soil fertility management sequences for reducing climate risk in smallholder crop production systems in southern Africa
    Nezomba, Hatirarami
    Mtambanengwe, Florence
    Rurinda, Jairos
    Mapfumo, Paul
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2018, 224 : 102 - 114
  • [10] Modelling smallholder farmers' preferences for soil fertility management technologies in Benin: A stated preference approach
    Zossou, Segla Roch Cedrique
    Adegbola, Patrice Ygue
    Oussou, Brice Tiburce
    Dagbenonbakin, Gustave
    Mongbo, Roch
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):