Aid-for-trade facilitation

被引:71
|
作者
Helble, Matthias [2 ]
Mann, Catherine L. [3 ]
Wilson, John S. [1 ]
机构
[1] World Bank Grp, Dev Res Grp Trade, Washington, DC USA
[2] World Trade Org, Trade & Environm Div, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Brandeis Univ, Int Business Sch, Waltham, MA USA
关键词
Aid for trade; Foreign aid; Trade costs; Trade facilitation; COSTS; ASSISTANCE; STANDARDS; EXPORTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10290-011-0115-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
'Aid for Trade' is an ongoing and high-profile discussion associated with the Doha negotiations of the World Trade Organization. It also relates to questions of how best to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. Questions remain, however, about whether foreign aid spent on trade facilitation increases trade flows of developing countries. Does it work differently from aid in general? Using detailed data on aid flows from the OECD, the analysis here estimates the relationship between specific types of aid and trade flows, both globally and of the aid recipients. The findings indicate that aid spent on promoting trade is positively associated with global trade. For most types of such aid-for-trade facilitation, it is relatively more strongly associated with recipient exports than their imports. In contrast 'other' types of aid are more strongly associated with recipient imports. Based on elasticities estimated over 16 years of trade and aid data for 40 donor countries and about 170 country trading pairs, our results suggest that a 1% increase in aid-for-trade facilitation (of about US$ 220 million in 2008) correlates to about US$ 290 million of additional exports from the aid receiving countries.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 376
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aid-for-trade facilitation
    Matthias Helble
    Catherine L. Mann
    John S. Wilson
    [J]. Review of World Economics, 2012, 148 : 357 - 376
  • [2] The Spanish aid-for-trade network
    Hughes, Neil
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IBERIAN STUDIES, 2006, 19 (02) : 137 - 154
  • [3] Are bilateral and multilateral aid-for-trade complementary?
    Tadesse, Bedassa
    Shukralla, Elias
    Fayissa, Bichaka
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2017, 40 (10): : 2125 - 2152
  • [4] The Link Between Aid-for-Trade and Contingent Protection
    Upadhayay, Neha Bhardwaj
    [J]. FOREIGN TRADE REVIEW, 2023,
  • [5] Development Goals, commercial interest and EU Aid-for-Trade
    Hoekman, Bernard
    Shingal, Anirudh
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 173
  • [6] Is aid-for-trade working? Evidence from Southeast Asian countries
    Lee, Yujin
    Oh, Jinhwan
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 27 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [7] Effectiveness of aid-for-trade: Are there strings attached? Empirical evidence and the case of Vietnam
    Kim, Chanyou
    Chae, Joo Eun
    Oh, Jinhwan
    [J]. POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2020, 32 (01) : 113 - 124
  • [8] Heterogeneous effects of Aid-for-Trade on donor exports: Why is Japan different?
    Nishitateno, Shuhei
    Umetani, Hayato
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 31 (03) : 1117 - 1145
  • [9] Sectoral Aid-for-Trade and Sectoral Exports: A Seemingly Unrelated Regression Analysis
    Ghimire, Shankar
    Mukherjee, Debasri
    Alvi, Eskander
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2013, 33 (04): : 2744 - 2755
  • [10] The Impact of Aid for Trade Facilitation on the Costs of Trading
    Busse, Matthias
    Hoekstra, Ruth
    Koeniger, Jens
    [J]. KYKLOS, 2012, 65 (02) : 143 - 163