Comparison of long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents for saphenous vein graft stenosis

被引:8
|
作者
Chakravarty, Tarun [1 ]
Morrissey, Ryan P. [1 ]
Wertman, Brett [1 ]
Naghi, Jesse [1 ]
Chou, Stanley [1 ]
Goykhman, Pavel [1 ]
Doctor, Niraj [1 ]
Mirocha, James [1 ]
Forrester, James S. [1 ]
Makkar, Raj [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Cedars Sinai Heart Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
GRFT; bypass grafts - coronary; PCI; percutaneous coronary intervention; COMP; complications adult cath; intervention; FOLLOW-UP; INTERVENTION; LESIONS; TRIAL; IMPLANTATION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.23187
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Our aim was to compare the long-term outcomes between drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents for saphenous vein graft stenosis. Background: The ideal type of stent to treat saphenous vein graft stenosis has not been clearly established. Short-term randomized controlled trial results comparing drug-eluting stents with bare-metal stents for saphenous vein graft stenosis are conflicting, intermediate-term retrospective studies and meta-analyses at two years suggest no difference in outcomes, and there are no long term follow-up studies. The need for long term follow-up data has become emerged with concern over late stent thrombosis. Methods: 246 saphenous vein graft patients undergoing stenting from August 2002December 2008 were studied. Overall survival and event-free survival were compared by Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by Cox-proportional hazards models. Results: We treated 133 patients with DES (median follow-up four years) and 113 patients with BMS (median follow-up four years) for SVG stenosis. Overall survival (77.0% +/- 3.9% vs. 70.6% +/- 4.6%, log-rank P = 0.60) and MACE-free survival (57.5% +/- 4.6% vs. 56.8% +/- 4.9, log-rank P = 0.70) were not significantly different between the DES and BMS groups. Although BMS was associated with increased risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (freedom from TLR 85.2% +/- 3.5% vs. 90.0% +/- 3.0%, HR 2.07, 95% CI 0.974.42, log-rank P = 0.05), there was no significant difference in the freedom from myocardial infarction (86.7% +/- 3.3% vs. 88.7% +/- 3.2%, log-rank P = 0.39) or target vessel revascularization (77.1% +/- 4.2% vs. 76.1% +/- 4.2%, log-rank P = 0.33) between the two groups. Conclusions: Although mortality is not statistically different between DES and BMS for SVG stenosis, BMS is associated with increased risk of revascularization, thus suggesting the superiority of DES over BMS in the long term. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 909
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-Term Clinical Results of Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions with the Treatment of Bare-Metal Stents and Drug-Eluting Stents
    Yildiz, Abdulmelik
    Karabay, Kanber Ocal
    Tekiner, Fatih
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : C234 - C234
  • [2] Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for saphenous vein graft interventions
    Shah, Rahman
    Hesterberg, Kirstin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 : S1257 - S1260
  • [3] Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting and bare metal stents in saphenous vein grafts
    Frobert, Ole
    Schersten, Fredrik
    James, Stefan K.
    Carlsson, Jorg
    Lagerqvist, Bo
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 164 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [4] A Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft PCI Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Foley, James
    Nair, Satheesh
    Wiper, Andrew
    Clarke, Bernard
    El-Omar, Magdi
    Fraser, Douglas G.
    Khattar, Rajdeep
    Neyses, Ludwig
    Fath-Ordoubadi, Farzin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 24 (02) : 172 - 180
  • [5] Comparison by Meta-Analysis of Drug-Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents for Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention
    Lee, Michael S.
    Yang, Tae
    Kandzari, David E.
    Tobis, Jonathan M.
    Liao, Hsini
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 105 (08): : 1076 - 1082
  • [6] Long-term clinical outcome of patients with saphenous vein graft lesions treated with drug-eluting stents; comparison with patients treated with bare metal stents
    Voudris, V.
    Thomopoulou, S.
    Karyofillis, P.
    Kalianos, C.
    Manginas, A.
    Pavlides, G.
    Spargias, C.
    Cokkinos, D. V.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (12) : E191 - E191
  • [7] Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents for Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention
    Takagi, Hisato
    Manabe, Hideaki
    Umemoto, Takuya
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 106 (10): : 1522 - 1524
  • [8] Comparison of Drug-eluting Stents to Bare Metal Stents for Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis: Longest Available Follow-up Analysis
    Chakravarty, Tarun
    Morrissey, Ryan P.
    Wertman, Brett
    Naghi, Jesse
    Chou, Stanley
    Goykhman, Pavel
    Hirota, Sean
    Doctor, Niraj
    Mirocha, James M.
    Forrester, James S.
    Makkar, Raj
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [9] Comparison of Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Grafts. Immediate and Long-Term Results
    Lozano, Inigo
    Garcia-Camarero, Tamara
    Carrillo, Pilar
    Baz, Jose A.
    de la Torre, Jose M.
    Lopez-Palop, Ramon
    Pinar, Eduardo
    Salvatella, Neus
    Avanzas, Pablo
    Valdes, Mariano
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2009, 62 (01): : 39 - 47
  • [10] Long-term clinical outcome in patients with saphenous vein graft lesions treated with drug-eluting and bare metal stents
    Voudris, V.
    Thomopoulou, S.
    Karyofillis, P.
    Manginas, A.
    Karavolias, G.
    Pavlides, G.
    Sbarouni, E.
    Spargias, C.
    Adamopoulos, S.
    Cokkinos, D. V.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 214 - 215