A Comparative Study of Breast Sensibility and Patient Satisfaction After Breast Reconstruction Autologous, 2-Stage Implant-Based, and Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction

被引:6
|
作者
Hwang, Yong-Jae [1 ]
Lee, Hyung-Chul [1 ]
Park, Seung-Ha [1 ]
Yoon, Eul-Sik [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstmct Surg, Anam Hosp, 73 Goiyeodac Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
关键词
breast reconstruction; prepectoral; acellular dermal matrix; breast sensory; SPONTANEOUS REINNERVATION; SPARING MASTECTOMY; PERFORATOR FLAPS; SENSATION; SKIN; SENSITIVITY; NIPPLE; SUPERIOR; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003034
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Currently, a variety of treatment modalities are implemented for breast reconstruction. However, clinical prognosis regarding sensory regeneration of the breast and patient-reported satisfaction remains underexamined. In this study, we aimed to compare breast sensibility after various reconstruction. Methods We conducted a retrospective comparative study of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction between August 2016 and October 2019 at our institution. Acellular dermal matrixes were used to cover the implant inferolaterally in a dual-plane subpectoral approach and to wrap the implant in prepectoral direct to implant (DTI). The cutaneous tactile pressure threshold and patient satisfaction outcome were tested. Results A total of 105 breasts were assessed, 30 breasts reconstructed with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, 40 breasts reconstructed with 2-stage subpectoral implant, and 35 breasts reconstructed with prepectoral DTI. In the specific group-to-group analysis, DIEP and implant groups showed significant differences in sensory recovery, mainly in lateral areas of the reconstructed breast. In 2-stage reconstruction and DTI groups, there were no statistically significant differences. When comparing patient groups using only patients with follow-up lengths of more than 12 months, the difference was more clearly indicated (P = 0.049). Better sensory recovery predicted high satisfaction scores in patient-reported outcomes (P = 0.007). Conclusions We found that subpectoral implant reconstruction and DTI show no statistically significant differences in sensory recovery, and autologous DIEP flap reconstruction results in a better prognosis than prosthesis implant reconstruction. Furthermore, the clarity of the differences increased when the follow-up length was longer than 12 months. Better patient-reported satisfaction was associated with good breast sensibility.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 270
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Direct-to-Implant as a Frontline Option for Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study With 2-Stage Reconstruction
    Han, Hyun Ho
    Kim, Hyung Bae
    Kim, Eun Key
    Eom, Jin Sup
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 81 (03) : 274 - 279
  • [2] Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Safran, Tyler
    Al-Badarin, Faris
    Al-Halabi, Becher
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (01) : 22E - 31E
  • [3] Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
    Bijkerk, E.
    van Kuijk, S. M. J.
    Beugels, J.
    Cornelissen, A. J. M.
    Heuts, E. M.
    van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
    Tuinder, S. M. H.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 175 (02) : 369 - 378
  • [4] Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
    E. Bijkerk
    S. M. J. van Kuijk
    J. Beugels
    A. J. M. Cornelissen
    E. M. Heuts
    R. R. W. J. van der Hulst
    S. M. H. Tuinder
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 175 : 369 - 378
  • [5] Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Safran, Tyler
    Al-Halabi, Becher
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Hazan, Jessica
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (06) : 882E - 890E
  • [6] A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, Jeong-Hoon
    Hong, Seung Eun
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (10): : 1 - 10
  • [7] Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast-Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Fabbri, Mariachiara
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Adesi, Liliana Barone
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2024, 44 (05) : 503 - 515
  • [8] Comparative study of patient outcomes between direct to implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Caputo, Glenda Giorgia
    Vigato, Enrico
    Cordaro, Emanuele Rampino
    Parodi, Pier Camillo
    Governa, Maurizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (10): : 2573 - 2579
  • [9] A Guide to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A New Dimension to Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Vidya, Raghavan
    Iqbal, Fahad Mujtaba
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2017, 17 (04) : 266 - 271
  • [10] A Comparative Study of Secondary Procedures after Subpectoral and Prepectoral Single-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Abbas, Abeera
    Rizki, Hirah
    Tanska, Aleksandra
    Concepcion, Mae
    Tasoulis, Marios Konstantinos
    Gui, Gerald
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (01) : 7 - 15