EFFECT OF VARIABLE TEMPERATURE ON THE FATIGUE LIFE AND CRACK GROWTH RATES OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS IN PWR COOLANT ENVIRONMENTS

被引:0
|
作者
Platts, N. [1 ]
Gill, P. [1 ]
Cruchley, S. [2 ]
Grieveson, E. [2 ]
Twite, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Amec Foster Wheeler, Warrington, Cheshire, England
[2] Rolls Royce, POB 2000, Derby DE21 7XX, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) primary coolant environment is known both to significantly reduce the fatigue life of austenitic stainless steels and to lead to enhanced fatigue crack propagation rates. Relationships for the impact of the PWR coolant environment on fatigue life have been presented in NUREG/CR-6909 using an environmental fatigue correction factor (Fen), which is a function of temperature. Fatigue crack growth behavior has been codified in ASME Code Case N-809 in terms of parameters such as rise time, stress intensity factor, load ratio and temperature. However, plant performance suggests that the application of these predicted environmental effects using current assessment procedures for fatigue for plant transient loading may be unduly pessimistic. One potential reason for this over-conservatism is thought to be that, although the majority of plant design transients result from variations in thermal loading, most available data are derived from isothermal testing. For the calculation of fatigue initiation life, NUREG/CR-6909 gives guidance on the effective temperature to be used in assessments of thermal transients. Recent results from Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue (TMF) testing on stainless steels in PWR coolant show that this guidance is conservative for out-of-phase cycling of temperature and loading, and potentially non-conservative for in-phase thermal loading. In contrast, code case N-809 gives no guidance on the effective temperature for fatigue crack growth assessments, resulting in maximum temperatures frequently being adopted for assessments of thermal transients. There is therefore a need for a clearer understanding of the impact of variable temperatures during transients on the predicted levels of environmental fatigue. This paper describes test facilities developed to permit measurements of both thermo-mechanical fatigue life and fatigue crack growth rates in pressurized water reactor environments. Initial test results obtained using these facilities are presented. The fatigue life data have been generated for a range of applied strain amplitudes, 0.45% to 1%, using temperature cycling between 100 degrees C and 300 degrees C. These data, for both in- and out-of-phase temperature and loading, are compared to the predictions of the "weighted Fen" model which is detailed in a separate paper, PVP2017-66030. Similarly, crack growth rate data generated for cycles between 140 C and 280 C are presented and comparisons made against the predictions of the "weighted K rate" (WKR) method detailed in paper PVP2017-65645. In both cases, the test results suggest that the weighted models are able to provide good predictions of an effective temperature to be used in fatigue assessment methods, which offer a significant improvement in the treatment of variable temperatures compared to current assessment practice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF HOLD PERIODS ON THE CORROSION FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH RATES OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS IN LWR COOLANT ENVIRONMENTS
    Platts, Norman
    Tice, David R.
    Panteli, Alexandra
    Cruchley, Sam
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 1A, 2017,
  • [2] Influence of PWR primary coolant environment on corrosion fatigue crack growth of austenitic stainless steel
    Tice, David
    Platts, Norman
    Rigby, Keith
    Stairmand, John
    Swan, David
    [J]. Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference - 2005, Vol 1, 2005, : 193 - 205
  • [3] Fatigue crack growth threshold of austenitic stainless steels in simulated PWR primary water
    Tsutsumi, Kazuya
    Yamamoto, Kenji
    Nitta, Yoshikazu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE 2007, VOL 1: CODES AND STANDARDS, 2007, 1 : 243 - 251
  • [4] Crack Growth Rates of Irradiated Commercial Stainless Steels in BWR and PWR Environments
    Jenssen, Anders
    Stjarnsater, Johan
    Pathania, Raj
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION OF MATERIALS IN NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS-WATER REACTORS, 2011, : 1229 - 1240
  • [5] Effects of LWR coolant environments on fatigue lives of austenitic stainless steels
    Chopra, OK
    Gavenda, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1998, 120 (02): : 116 - 121
  • [6] Thermal fatigue crack growth in austenitic stainless steels
    Virkkunen, I
    Kemppainen, M
    Hänninen, H
    [J]. FATIGUE '99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL FATIGUE CONGRESS, VOLS 1-4, 1999, : 2183 - 2188
  • [7] EFFECT OF SURFACE CONDITION ON THE FATIGUE LIFE OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS IN HIGH TEMPERATURE WATER ENVIRONMENTS
    Platts, Norman
    Tice, David
    Stairmand, John
    Mottershead, Kevin
    Zhang, Wenzhong
    Meldrum, James
    McLennan, Alec
    [J]. ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2015, VOL 1A, 2015,
  • [8] EFFECT OF SURFACE CONDITION ON THE FATIGUE LIFE OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS IN HIGH TEMPERATURE WATER ENVIRONMENTS
    Morley, Andrew
    Twite, Marius
    Platts, Norman
    McLennan, Alec
    Currie, Chris
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 1A, 2019,
  • [9] THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW METHOD TO COMPARE THE FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH RATES OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL OPERATING IN A PWR PRIMARY COOLANT SUBJECTED TO PLANT REALISTIC TEMPERATURE LOADING
    Howe, Benjamin
    Scenini, Fabio
    Burke, Grace
    Mann, Jonathan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP2022, VOL 1, 2022,
  • [10] Crack growth rates of irradiated austenitic stainless steels in BWR environments at 289°c
    Chopra, O. K.
    Gruber, E. E.
    Alexandreanu, B.
    Chen, Y.
    Shack, W. J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE 2007, VOL 1: CODES AND STANDARDS, 2007, 1 : 253 - 268