Flow cytometric evaluation of lymphocyte subpopulations in BALF of healthy smokers and nonsmokers

被引:0
|
作者
Hoser, G
Kawiak, J
Domagala-Kulawik, J
Kopinski, P
Droszcz, W
机构
[1] Med Ctr Postgrad Educ, Dept Clin Cytol, PL-01813 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Sch Med, Dept Pulmonol, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Dept Pathophysiol, Krakow, Poland
来源
FOLIA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOBIOLOGICA | 1999年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
bronchoalveolar lavage; lymphocyte subsets; smokers; flow cytometry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the normal lymphocyte phenotype in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). BAL was carried out in 12 untreated healthy nonsmoking volunteers and in 9 cigarette smokers. For the analysis of lymphocyte subsets by two-color flow cytometry, the monoclonal antibodies used were directed anti: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD16, CD19, D25, CD45, CD56 and anti HLA-DR. An increase in the total number of cells in BALF of smoking persons and increased proportion of macrophages was observed. The percentage of CD8(+) lymphocytes was 1.7 times higher, whereas the proportions of CD4(+) cells, and a CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio were lower 1.5 and 2.6 times, respectively, in the BALF of cigarette smoking persons when compared with nonsmoking volunteers. The changes did not depend on the age of the person. In conclusion, we suggest that the decreased CD4/CD8 ratio and the elevated CD8 T cell subset may be regarded as a potential risk factor associated with clinically asymptomatic lung cancer. Moreover, in the interpretation of BALF from patients with pulmonary diseases cell proportions of nonsmoking and of smoking persons should be compared with the respective controls.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:25 / 30
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FLOW-VOLUME CURVES IN HEALTHY NONSMOKERS AND IN SMOKERS
    HEDENSTIERNA, G
    JORFELDT, L
    BYGDEMAN, S
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 1 (04): : 339 - 348
  • [2] Flow cytometric detection of glucocorticoid receptor in lymphocyte subpopulations
    Berki, T
    Tavakoli, A
    Kalmár-Nagy, K
    Dajka, L
    Németh, P
    CYTOMETRY, 2000, 42 (02): : 143 - 144
  • [3] Flow cytometric analysis of induced sputum lymphocyte subpopulations
    Loppow, D
    Böttcher, M
    Jörres, RA
    Gercken, G
    Magnussen, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (03) : A514 - A514
  • [4] IMPROVING THE FLOW CYTOMETRIC METHODS FOR SCINTILLATING LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS
    SIMONOVA, AV
    KOTOVA, OM
    TOLSTOV, YV
    LABORATORNOE DELO, 1988, (03): : 32 - 34
  • [5] FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS DURING MURINE COCCIDIOSIS
    LILLEHOJ, HS
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1985, 44 (04) : 981 - 981
  • [6] Flow cytometric quantification of lymphocyte subpopulations in middleear effusion (MEE)
    Canic, R
    Beusan, IS
    Dekaris, D
    4TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 1389 - 1391
  • [7] PERIPHERAL-BLOOD LEUKOCYTES AND LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS AS DETERMINED BY FLOW CYTOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS IN HEALTHY-CHILDREN
    KAWIAK, J
    ROKICKAMILEWSKA, R
    ZEMAN, K
    HOSER, G
    DERULSKA, G
    FORNALCZYKWACHOWSKA, E
    GOSK, B
    KANTORSKI, J
    PACHOLSKA, J
    TCHORZEWSKI, H
    PAWELEC, K
    CZKWIANIANC, E
    FOLIA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOBIOLOGICA, 1995, 33 (01): : 33 - 38
  • [8] FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PARTIAL DIGEORGE SYNDROME
    SLADE, HB
    PAHWA, S
    GREENWOOD, JH
    BEEKMAN, RH
    HUDSON, JL
    SCHWARTZ, SA
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1988, 81 (01) : 286 - 286
  • [9] Lymphocyte subpopulations among passive smokers
    Nakata, A
    Tanigawa, T
    Araki, S
    Sakurai, S
    Iso, H
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14): : 1699 - 1700
  • [10] FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS IN INFANTS WITH CONGENITAL HEART-DISEASE
    SLADE, HB
    GREENWOOD, JH
    BEEKMAN, RH
    MCCOY, JP
    HUDSON, JL
    PAHWA, S
    SCHWARTZ, SA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 1989, 3 (01) : 14 - 20