Clinical significance of DAPK promoter hypermethylation in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Jia-Ning [1 ]
Liu, Zhi-Hao [2 ]
Shen, Dong [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ Med Coll, Dept Emergency, Affiliated Jiangyin Hosp, 163 Shoushan Rd, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Prov Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Inst Hlth Educ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ Med Coll, Affiliated Jiangyin Hosp, Dept Oncol, 163 Shoushan Rd, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Stomach neoplasm; DAPK; methylation; meta-analysis; CPG ISLAND HYPERMETHYLATION; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR GENES; METHYLATION STATUS; DNA METHYLATION; KINASE; RUNX3; PROGNOSIS; MUCOSA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) gene promoter methylation was reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC) in previous studies. However, the results remained inconsistent. We conducted a systematic literature search of the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Database for the relevant articles (up to October 2015). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association between DAPK methylation and GC risk. A total of 24 studies, comprising 3,250 samples, were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Our study revealed that DAPK promoter methylation levels were significantly different in the following comparisons: GC tissues vs. adjacent tissues (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.48-7.33, P = 0.004), GC tissues vs. normal tissues (OR = 19.91, 95% CI = 11.77-33.69, P< 0.001), GC blood samples vs. normal blood samples (OR = 25.11, 95% CI = 3.48-181.36, P = 0.001), adjacent tissues vs. normal tissues (OR = 5.67, 95% CI = 3.95-8.12, P< 0.001), GC tissues vs. intestinal metaplasia (IM) tissues (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.22-8.86, P = 0.019), IM tissues vs. normal tissues (OR = 8.01, 95% CI = 1.34-47.78, P = 0.022). In addition, the relationships between DAPK promoter methylation and TNM stage, differentiation status and nodal metastasis among GC cases were also identified. Our meta-analysis identified a strong association of DAPK promoter hypermethylation with GC risk, provided the evidence that DAPK promoter methylation might contribute to tumorigenesis, progression in GC, and might be a promising potential biomarker.
引用
收藏
页码:7883 / 7895
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical significance of DAPK promoter hypermethylation in lung cancer: a meta-analysis
    Li, Ying
    Zhu, Min
    Zhang, Xiaoju
    Cheng, Dongjun
    Ma, Xitao
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2015, 9 : 1785 - 1796
  • [2] Clinical effect of DAPK promoter methylation in gastric cancer: A systematic meta-analysis
    Jia, Wenzhuo
    Yu, Tao
    Cao, Xianglong
    An, Qi
    Yang, Hua
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (43)
  • [3] Clinicopathological significance of DAPK gene promoter hypermethylation in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Zhimao
    Fan, Yu
    Liu, Xiangzheng
    Shang, Xueqian
    Qi, Kang
    Zhang, Shijie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2022, 37 (01): : 47 - 57
  • [4] Analysis of Promoter Hypermethylation of DAPK and BAX Apoptotic Genes in Iranian Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
    Poudineh, Somayeh Nazerian
    Tehrani, Golnaz Asaadi
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 11 (02) : 140 - 149
  • [5] RETRACTED: Prognostic significance of DAPK promoter methylation in lymphoma: A meta-analysis (Retracted Article)
    Wang, Hong
    Zhou, Lin-Yu
    Guan, Ze-Bing
    Zeng, Wen-Bin
    Zhou, Lan-Lan
    Liu, Ya-Nan
    Pan, Xue-Yi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [6] DAPK Promoter Methylation and Bladder Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dai, Lihe
    Ma, Chong
    Zhang, Zhensheng
    Zeng, Shuxiong
    Liu, Anwei
    Tang, Shijie
    Ren, Qian
    Sun, Yinghao
    Xu, Chuanliang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [7] Association between multiple gene promoter hypermethylation and the risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wen, JianRu
    Deng, SiXiu
    Bi, YuHua
    Qiao, LiJuan
    Xu, Hui
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2023, 55 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [8] Runt-related transcription factor 3 promoter hypermethylation and gastric cancer risk: A meta-analysis
    Mei Lina
    Wu Changan
    Zhao Qing
    [J]. OPEN LIFE SCIENCES, 2018, 13 (01): : 64 - 70
  • [9] Clinical significance of claudin-1 in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Pan, Lijia
    Yang, Ziyi
    Liu, Shilei
    Li, Fengnan
    Shu, Yijun
    Lv, Wenjie
    Dong, Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (01): : 26 - 37
  • [10] The clinical significance of snail protein expression in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Xiaoya Chen
    Jinjun Li
    Ling Hu
    William Yang
    Lili Lu
    Hongyan Jin
    Zexiong Wei
    Jack Y. Yang
    Hamid R. Arabnia
    Jun S. Liu
    Mary Qu Yang
    Youping Deng
    [J]. Human Genomics, 10