The drug market in four European countries

被引:7
|
作者
Garattini, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Mario Negri Inst Pharmacol Res, I-20157 Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199814001-00010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Prescription drugs should be therapeutically validated products which are selected for the treatment of accurately diagnosed diseases according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. However, industrial promotion of pharmaceuticals has meant that drug prescription patterns are not always concordant with these ideals. For example, consideration of the most sold drugs in 4 European countries Italy, France, Germany and the United Kingdom - in 1992 and 1996 shows that marked variations in the utilisation of therapeutic classes, single active principles, and even routes of administration of the same active principles exist in these countries. To some extent, these differences reflect the influence of promotion by national pharmaceutical companies, but they also arise from other factors, such as the lack of adequate pharmacological training of physicians, the paucity of reliable comparative clinical data to allow clinicians to distinguish between large numbers of more expensive 'me-too' drugs and their prototypes, and the idiosyncrasies of national drug approval and registration systems. In addition, differences in prices across countries as well as the length of time a drug has been on the market may be contributing factors. It is hoped that the creation in 1995 of the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA), which is working towards centralisation of drug marketing approval in the European Union (EU), will usher in the establishment of a common pharmaceutical culture that will combat some of the variations and inconsistencies in drug prescribing patterns evident in European countries. Adoption of such evidence-based and more rational prescribing patterns should not only reduce the number of unnecessary and perhaps undesirable prescriptions written for patients but also relieve the financial burden on national health services in EU countries.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 79
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Drug Market in Four European Countries
    Silvio Garattini
    PharmacoEconomics, 1998, 14 : 69 - 79
  • [2] Drug sales in four European countries still differ
    Garattini, S
    Garattiuni, L
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7428): : 1404 - 1405
  • [3] RISK MANAGEMENT ON EQUITY MARKET: EVIDENCE FROM FOUR EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Ngan Pham Thi
    Duc Tran Cong
    12TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2018, : 1388 - 1400
  • [4] STOCK MARKET ANOMALIES. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES IN FOUR EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Rossi, Matteo
    Della Peruta, Maria Rosaria
    Yiannaki, Mihai Simona
    INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS, 2016, : 1560 - 1567
  • [5] Therapeutic drug use during pregnancy:: A comparison in four European countries
    De Vigan, C
    De Walle, HEK
    Cordier, S
    Goujard, J
    Knill-Jones, R
    Aymé, S
    Calzolari, E
    Bianchi, F
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (10) : 977 - 982
  • [6] A CALL TO MONITOR DRUG SHORTAGES AND THE ROLE OF MARKET ATTRACTIVENESS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Pauwels, K.
    Huys, I
    Casteels, M.
    Simoens, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A98 - A98
  • [7] The role Central European countries on European market
    Supin, M
    MANAGEMENT OF FORESTRY AND WOODPROCESSING ENTERPRISES IN MARKET ECONOMY, 1997, : 137 - 143
  • [8] Medical administration in four European countries
    不详
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1941, 1941 : 61 - 62
  • [9] Epidemiologic Measures of Drug Use: Antiepileptic Drugs, Benzodiazepines, and Antidepressants in Four European Countries
    Ballarin, Elena
    Ferrer, Pili
    Sabate, Monica
    Laporte, Joan-Ramon
    Fortuny, Joan
    Schoonen, Marieke
    Tatt, Iain
    Hasford, Joerg
    Ibanez, Luisa
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 : 473 - 473
  • [10] 'Conduct of conduct' or the shaping of 'adequate dispositions'? Labour market and career guidance in four European countries
    Darmon, Isabelle
    Perez, Coralie
    CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2011, 31 (01) : 77 - 101