Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine-Learning Techniques in Shigatse Area, China

被引:113
|
作者
Zhang, Yonghong [1 ]
Ge, Taotao [1 ]
Tian, Wei [2 ]
Liou, Yuei-An [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Automat, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Comp & Software, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Cent Univ, Ctr Space & Remote Sensing Res, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
debris flow susceptibility; remote sensing; GIS; oversampling methods; back propagation neural network; one-dimensional convolutional neural network; decision tree; random forest; extreme gradient boosting; GLOBAL LAND-COVER; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; FREQUENCY RATIO; DECISION TREE; MODELS; GIS; APPLICABILITY; REGION; VOLUME;
D O I
10.3390/rs11232801
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Debris flows have been always a serious problem in the mountain areas. Research on the assessment of debris flows susceptibility (DFS) is useful for preventing and mitigating debris flow risks. The main purpose of this work is to study the DFS in the Shigatse area of Tibet, by using machine learning methods, after assessing the main triggering factors of debris flows. Remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) are used to obtain datasets of topography, vegetation, human activities and soil factors for local debris flows. The problem of debris flow susceptibility level imbalances in datasets is addressed by the Borderline-SMOTE method. Five machine learning methods, i.e., back propagation neural network (BPNN), one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) have been used to analyze and fit the relationship between debris flow triggering factors and occurrence, and to evaluate the weight of each triggering factor. The ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests have revealed that the XGBoost model exhibited the best mean accuracy (0.924) on ten-fold cross-validation and the performance was significantly better than that of the BPNN (0.871), DT (0.816), and RF (0.901). However, the performance of the XGBoost did not significantly differ from that of the 1D-CNN (0.914). This is also the first comparison experiment between XGBoost and 1D-CNN methods in the DFS study. The DFS maps have been verified by five evaluation methods: Precision, Recall, F1 score, Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). Experiments show that the XGBoost has the best score, and the factors that have a greater impact on debris flows are aspect, annual average rainfall, profile curvature, and elevation.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for debris flow susceptibility mapping
    Zhu Liang
    Chang-Ming Wang
    Zhi-Min Zhang
    Kaleem-Ullah-Jan Khan
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2020, 34 : 1887 - 1907
  • [2] A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for debris flow susceptibility mapping
    Liang, Zhu
    Wang, Chang-Ming
    Zhang, Zhi-Min
    Khan, Kaleem-Ullah-Jan
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 34 (11) : 1887 - 1907
  • [3] Application of Machine Learning to Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping along the China-Pakistan Karakoram Highway
    Qing, Feng
    Zhao, Yan
    Meng, Xingmin
    Su, Xiaojun
    Qi, Tianjun
    Yue, Dongxia
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [4] Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods for Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in the Sichuan Province, China
    Xiong, Ke
    Adhikari, Basanta Raj
    Stamatopoulos, Constantine A.
    Zhan, Yu
    Wu, Shaolin
    Dong, Zhongtao
    Di, Baofeng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [5] Assessing Susceptibility of Debris Flow in Southwest China Using Gradient Boosting Machine
    Baofeng Di
    Hanyue Zhang
    Yongyao Liu
    Jierui Li
    Ningsheng Chen
    Constantine A. Stamatopoulos
    Yuzhou Luo
    Yu Zhan
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [6] Assessing Susceptibility of Debris Flow in Southwest China Using Gradient Boosting Machine
    Di, Baofeng
    Zhang, Hanyue
    Liu, Yongyao
    Li, Jierui
    Chen, Ningsheng
    Stamatopoulos, Constantine A.
    Luo, Yuzhou
    Zhan, Yu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [7] Optimizing landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning and geospatial techniques
    Agboola, Gazali
    Beni, Leila Hashemi
    Elbayoumi, Tamer
    Thompson, Gary
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 81
  • [8] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Mountainous Area Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Shahabi, Himan
    Ahmadi, Reza
    Alizadeh, Mohsen
    Hashim, Mazlan
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Wolf, Isabelle D.
    Ariffin, Effi Helmy
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [9] DVFS Binning Using Machine-Learning Techniques
    Chang, Keng-Wei
    Huang, Chun-Yang
    Mu, Szu-Pang
    Huang, Jian-Min
    Chen, Shi-Hao
    Chao, Mango C-T
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL TEST CONFERENCE IN ASIA (ITC-ASIA 2018), 2018, : 31 - 36
  • [10] Software Enhancement Effort Prediction Using Machine-Learning Techniques: A Systematic Mapping Study
    Sakhrawi Z.
    Sellami A.
    Bouassida N.
    SN Computer Science, 2021, 2 (6)