Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability

被引:12
|
作者
Olaru, Gabriel [1 ]
Burrus, Jeremy [2 ]
MacCann, Carolyn [3 ]
Zaromb, Franklin M. [4 ]
Wilhelm, Oliver [5 ]
Roberts, Richard D. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kassel, Kassel, Germany
[2] Amer Coll Testing, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Natl Author Measurement & Evaluat Educ, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Ulm Univ, Ulm, Germany
[6] Rad Sci Solut, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
JOB-PERFORMANCE; INCREMENTAL VALIDITY; RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS; ADVERSE IMPACT; 5-FACTOR MODEL; TRAIT CHANGE; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTORS; SELECTION; DOMAINS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0211884
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are criterion valid low fidelity measures that have gained much popularity as predictors of job performance. A broad variety of SJTs have been studied, but SJTs measuring personality are still rare. Personality traits such as Conscientiousness are valid predictors of many educational, work and life-related outcomes and SJTs are less prone to faking than classical self-report measurements. We developed an SJT measure of Dependability, a core facet of Conscientiousness, by gathering critical incidents in semi-structured interviews using the construct definition of Dependability as a prompt. We examined the psychometric properties of the newly developed SJTs across two studies (N = 546 general population; N = 440 sales professionals). The internal validity of the SJTs was examined by correlating the SJT scores with related self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness, as well as testing the unidimensionality of the measure with CFA. Additionally, we specified a bi-factor model of SJT, self-report and behavioral checklist measures of Dependability accounting for common and specific measurement variance. External validity was examined by correlating the SJT scale and specific factor with work-related outcomes. The results show that the Dependability SJTs with an expert based scoring procedure were psychometrically sound and correlated moderately to highly with traditional self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness. However, a large proportion of SJT variance cannot be accounted for by personality alone. This supports the notion that SJTs measure general domain knowledge about the effectiveness of personality-related behaviors. We conclude that SJT measures of personality can be a promising addition to classical self-report assessments and can be used in a wide variety of applications beyond measurement and selection, for instance as formative assessments of personality.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Validity Evidence for Personality, Emotional Intelligence, and Situational Judgment Tests to Identify Successful Residents
    Gardner, Aimee K.
    Dunkin, Brian J.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (05) : 409 - 416
  • [2] Incremental validity of situational judgment tests
    Clevenger, J
    Pereira, GM
    Wiechmann, D
    Schmitt, N
    Harvey, VS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) : 410 - 417
  • [3] Can a Machine Pass a Situational Judgment Test Measuring Personality Perception?
    Chen, Lei
    Zaromb, Franklin
    Yang, Zhitong
    Leong, Chee Wee
    Martin-Raugh, Michelle
    [J]. 2017 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT INTERACTION WORKSHOPS AND DEMOS (ACIIW), 2017, : 7 - 11
  • [4] Validity evidence for the situational judgment test paradigm in emotional intelligence measurement
    Libbrecht, Nele
    Lievens, Filip
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 (06) : 438 - 447
  • [5] Do situational characteristics affect the validity of personality situational judgment items?
    Golubovich, Juliya
    Lake, Christopher J.
    Seybert, Jacob
    Anguiano-Carrasco, Cristina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 30 (03) : 427 - 447
  • [6] Measuring Intercultural Competence in Teachers: Development and Evaluation of Situational Judgment Test
    Khukhlaev, Oleg E.
    Pavlova, Olga S.
    Khakimov, Eduard R.
    Khukhlaeva, Olga, V
    Aleksandrova, Elena A.
    Krivtsova, Anna S.
    Leybman, Irina Ya
    Usybyan, Shushanik A.
    [J]. PSIKHOLOGICHESKAYA NAUKA I OBRAZOVANIE-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2021, 26 (06): : 46 - 57
  • [7] Validity Risks and Potential Advancements of Situational Judgment Tests and Assessment Centre Exercises in Personality Research
    Pretsch, Johanna
    Schmitt, Manfred
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2017, 31 (05) : 477 - 478
  • [8] Situational Judgment Tests as an Alternative Measure for Personality Assessment
    Mussel, Patrick
    Gatzka, Thomas
    Hewig, Johannes
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2018, 34 (05) : 328 - 335
  • [9] The influence of situational strength on the relation of personality and situational judgment test performance
    Freudenstein, Jan-Philipp
    Schaepers, Philipp
    Reznik, Nomi
    Stolte, Talea
    Krumm, Stefan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 32 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Effects of Situational Judgment Test Format on Reliability and Validity
    Martin-Raugh, Michelle P.
    Anguiano-Carrsaco, Cristina
    Jackson, Teresa
    Brenneman, Meghan W.
    Carney, Lauren
    Barnwell, Patrick
    Kochert, Jonathan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2018, 18 (02) : 135 - 154