Climate change mitigation and agriculture: measures, costs and policies - A literature review

被引:0
|
作者
Jussi, Lankoski [1 ]
Sanna, Lotjonen [2 ]
Markku, Ollikainen [2 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Resource Policies Div, OECD Trade & Agr Directorate, 2 Rue Andre Pascal, F-75116 Paris, France
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Econ & Management, POB 27, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
GHG emissions; carbon sinks; enteric fermentation; carbon tax; emissions trading; abatement subsidy; GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION; SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION; NITROUS-OXIDE; EMISSIONS; METAANALYSIS; CHALLENGES; BENEFITS; REGIONS; SECTOR; LEARNT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
We review the literature on climate change mitigation in agriculture with a focus on the use of climate policy instruments to incentivize the adoption of greenhouse gas mitigation measures. We develop an economic model characterizing the production decisions in animal and crop production farms and link our discussion on policy instruments to them. We review mitigation measures and their cost-effectiveness in reducing emissions. Given the multiple sources of agricultural emissions, the literature finds carbon taxes and emissions trading to perform best. The challenges involved in measuring and verifying changes in emissions make the implementation of policies targeting all sources of emissions difficult. Second-best policies addressing a subset of emissions, such as those from ruminants or mineral fertilizers, are more feasible but less efficient. Carbon sequestration in arable soils, while technically promising, faces the problems of heterogeneity in sequestration capacity, measurement, verification and permanence of sequestration. The variation of estimates on emissions reduction, abatement costs and differences in model simulations is large. A better basis for policy designs is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 129
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Need for Comprehensive Climate Change Mitigation Policies in European Agriculture
    Perez Dominguez, Ignacio
    Fellmann, Thomas
    [J]. EUROCHOICES, 2015, 14 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [2] Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Implications for Agriculture and Water Resources
    Frisvold, George
    Konyar, Kazim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION, 2013, 151 (01) : 27 - 42
  • [3] Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs
    Wilcock, Robert
    Elliott, Sandy
    Hudson, Neale
    Parkyn, Stephanie
    Quinn, John
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 58 (11) : 2093 - 2099
  • [4] Attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies: a review of measures and a construct of policy attitudes
    Kysela, Eva
    Scasny, Milan
    Zverinova, Iva
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2019, 19 (07) : 878 - 892
  • [5] Valorization Methodology for Agriculture Sector Climate Change Mitigation Measures
    Gancone, Agita
    Pubule, Jelena
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 25 (01) : 944 - 954
  • [6] Climate change mitigation scenarios and policies and measures: the case of Kazakhstan
    Kerimray, Aiymgul
    Baigarin, Kanat
    De Miglio, Rocco
    Tosato, Giancarlo
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 (03) : 332 - 352
  • [7] The climate gap: environmental health and equity implications of climate change and mitigation policies in California—a review of the literature
    Seth B. Shonkoff
    Rachel Morello-Frosch
    Manuel Pastor
    James Sadd
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 109 : 485 - 503
  • [8] Climate change mitigation and agriculture
    Vandermeer, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2013, 40 (03): : 601 - 602
  • [9] The climate gap: environmental health and equity implications of climate change and mitigation policies in California-a review of the literature
    Shonkoff, Seth B.
    Morello-Frosch, Rachel
    Pastor, Manuel
    Sadd, James
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 109 : 485 - 503
  • [10] Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Its Mitigation Strategies: A Review
    Malhi, Gurdeep Singh
    Kaur, Manpreet
    Kaushik, Prashant
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 21