A fault diagnosis method for complex chemical process based on multi-model fusion

被引:6
|
作者
He, Yadong [1 ]
Yang, Zhe [1 ]
Wang, Dong [2 ]
Gou, Chengdong [1 ]
Li, Chuankun [1 ]
Guo, Yian [1 ]
机构
[1] Sinopec Res Inst Safety Engn Co Ltd, State Key Lab safety control Chem, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Sinopec Integrated Management Dept, Beijing 100728, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Deep learning; Chemical process; Fault detection and diagnosis; Multi -model fusion; Feature extraction; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORK; CLASSIFICATION; USER;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2022.06.029
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Deep learning methods have become the mainstream research direction in the field of chemical process fault detection and diagnosis, which have great application and research value. However, the existing deep fault diagnosis methods are faced with challenges such as missing data, high-dimensional redundancy and difficulty in fault feature mining, which limits their application in industry. Based on this, a fault diagnosis method for complex chemical process based on multi-model fusion is proposed. This approach avoids over-fitting the model due to excessive redundant data by introducing a FunkSVD matrix decomposition model to augment the missing data without changing the data distribution and then inputting an extreme gradient boosting tree model to learn key features. Finally, the model memory and generalization capability are improved by training a very deep factor decomposer diagnostic model to extract and fuse linear, low-order interaction and high-order interaction features in an all-round way to adaptively establish the correlation between fault features and fault conditions. To validate the model effectiveness, extensive experiments were conducted on the Tennessee Eastman Process dataset and Fluidized Catalytic Cracker fractionation unit dataset, and the results showed that the proposed method has significant performance advantages over existing diagnostic methods in terms of precision and recall metrics.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:662 / 677
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-model fusion fault diagnosis
    Zhu, Ping
    Huang, Wenhu
    Jiang, Xingwei
    Yu, Baisheng
    Boyinhexige
    Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2000, 32 (04): : 1 - 3
  • [2] Research on the Gearbox Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Multi-Model Feature Fusion
    Xie, Fengyun
    Liu, Hui
    Dong, Jiankun
    Wang, Gan
    Wang, Linglan
    Li, Gang
    MACHINES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [3] Fault diagnosis and accommodation based on online multi-model for nonlinear process
    Li, Jun
    Bo, Cuimei
    Zhang, Jiugen
    Du, Jie
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4114 : 661 - 666
  • [4] Dynamic Multi-Point Fault Monitoring Method for Multi-Model Chemical Process
    多模态化工过程动态多点故障监测方法
    Hu, Jinqiu (hujq@cup.edu.cn), 2018, Science Press (34):
  • [5] A Self-Learning Fault Diagnosis Strategy Based on Multi-Model Fusion
    Wang, Tianzhen
    Dong, Jingjing
    Xie, Tao
    Diallo, Demba
    Benbouzid, Mohamed
    INFORMATION, 2019, 10 (03):
  • [6] SOC estimation and fault diagnosis framework of battery based on multi-model fusion modeling
    Li, Jiabo
    Ye, Min
    Ma, Xiaokang
    Wang, Qiao
    Wang, Yan
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 65
  • [7] Weak fault monitoring method for batch process based on multi-model SDKPCA
    Wang, Ya-Jun
    Jia, Ming-Xing
    Mao, Zhi-Zhong
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2012, 118 : 1 - 12
  • [8] Modular fault diagnosis for ROVs based on a multi-model approach
    Pabst, Jonas
    Mueller, Thilo
    Jeinsch, Torsten
    GLOBAL OCEANS 2020: SINGAPORE - U.S. GULF COAST, 2020,
  • [9] Multi-model and multi-level aluminum electrolytic fault diagnosis method
    Li, Jiejia
    Gao, Tianhao
    Ji, Xinyang
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2019, 41 (15) : 4409 - 4423
  • [10] ICA-SVM based fault diagnosis method for complex chemical process
    Bo, Cuimei
    Qiao, Xu
    Zhang, Guangming
    Zhang, Shi
    Yang, Hairong
    Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2009, 60 (09): : 2259 - 2264