Immune response against the biomaterials used in 3D bioprinting of organs

被引:21
|
作者
Elalouf, Amir [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Management, IL-5290002 Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
3D printed organs; Biomaterials; Immune response; FOREIGN-BODY RESPONSE; STEM-CELLS; HUMAN SKIN; IN-VIVO; VALVE CONDUITS; KEY PLAYERS; HYDROGEL; COLLAGEN; LIVER; BIOCOMPATIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trim.2021.101446
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Regenerative medicine has developed promising approaches for healing and replacing defective and damaged organs or tissues with functional ones. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting innovation has integrated a potential to design organs or tissues specific to the patient with the capability of rapid construction to fulfill the storage of organs and the need for transplantation. 3D bioprinting of organs has the main goal to develop a structural and functional organ or tissue mimic to the original one. The highly complex fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds containing biomaterials, tissue models, and biomedical devices has made it possible to print small blood vessels to mimic organs to reduce organ or tissue rejection. 3D bioprinting has the concept of bioinks containing biomaterials that may trigger the immune responses in the body. Nevertheless, foreign body response (FBR) is mediated by various cell types such as B-cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, natural killer cells, neutrophils, and T-cells, and molecular signals such as antibodies (Abs), cytokines, and reactive radical species. Typically, the biomaterial is shielded by the fibrous encapsulation that is regulated by molecular signals. This review explored the progress in 3D bioprinting of vital organs and basic immune response against the biomaterials used in this approach. Thus, evaluating immune response against biomaterials used in 3D printed organs is necessary to mitigate tissue rejection after the transplantation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D Bioprinting of Lignocellulosic Biomaterials
    Shavandi, Amin
    Hosseini, Soraya
    Okoro, Oseweuba Valentine
    Nie, Lei
    Eghbali Babadi, Farahnaz
    Melchels, Ferry
    [J]. ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2020, 9 (24)
  • [2] 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
    Sean V Murphy
    Anthony Atala
    [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32 : 773 - 785
  • [3] 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
    Murphy, Sean V.
    Atala, Anthony
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 32 (08) : 773 - 785
  • [4] Responsive biomaterials for 3D bioprinting: A review
    Fu, Zhouquan
    Ouyang, Liliang
    Xu, Runze
    Yang, Yang
    Sun, Wei
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY, 2022, 52 : 112 - 132
  • [5] 3D bioprinting of cells, tissues and organs
    Madhuri Dey
    Ibrahim T. Ozbolat
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [6] 3D bioprinting for lungs and hollow organs
    Galliger, Zachary
    Vogt, Caleb D.
    Panoskaltsis-Mortari, Angela
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 211 : 19 - 34
  • [7] 3D Bioprinting of Human Hollow Organs
    Nabanita Panja
    Sumana Maji
    Sabyasachi Choudhuri
    Kazi Asraf Ali
    Chowdhury Mobaswar Hossain
    [J]. AAPS PharmSciTech, 23
  • [8] 3D bioprinting of entangled artificial organs
    Bradley, David
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY, 2019, 28 : 4 - 4
  • [9] 3D bioprinting of cells, tissues and organs
    Dey, Madhuri
    Ozbolat, Ibrahim T.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [10] 3D Bioprinting of Human Hollow Organs
    Panja, Nabanita
    Maji, Sumana
    Choudhuri, Sabyasachi
    Ali, Kazi Asraf
    Hossain, Chowdhury Mobaswar
    [J]. AAPS PHARMSCITECH, 2022, 23 (05)