Evidence-based pregnancy testing in clinical trials: Recommendations from a multi-stakeholder development process

被引:5
|
作者
Morse, Jessica E. [1 ]
Calvert, Sara B. [2 ]
Jurkowski, Claire [3 ]
Tassinari, Melissa [4 ]
Sewell, Catherine A. [4 ]
Myers, Evan R. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Clin Trials Transformat Initiat, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Global Pharmacovigilance & Epidemiol, Hopewell, NJ USA
[4] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; POINT-OF-CARE; HCG DEVICES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0202474
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Most clinical trials exclude pregnant women in order to avoid the possibility of adverse embryonic and/or fetal effects. Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding appropriate methods for identifying early pregnancy among research subjects. This lack of guidance results in wide variation in pregnancy testing plans, leading to the potential for inadequate protection against embryonic or fetal exposure in some cases and unnecessary burdens on research participants in others, as well as inefficiencies caused by disagreements among sponsors, investigators, and regulators. To address this issue, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative convened content experts and stakeholders to develop recommendations for pregnancy testing in clinical research based on currently available evidence. Recommendations included: 1) the study protocol should clearly state the rationale for pregnancy testing and the plan for handling positive and indeterminate tests; 2) protocols should include an assessment of the pregnancy testing plan advantages (reduced risk of embryo/fetal exposure) versus the burdens (participant burden, study team workload, costs); 3) protocols should assess the participant burdens regarding the likelihood of false negative and false positive results; 4) participant administered home pregnancy testing should be avoided in clinical trials; and 5) the consent process should describe the extent of knowledge about the study intervention's potential risk to the embryo/fetus and the limitations and consequences of pregnancy testing. CTTI has also developed an online tool to help implement these recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From Solo Decision Maker to Multi-Stakeholder Process: A Defense and Recommendations
    Ozar, David
    Vukov, Joseph
    Rempala, Kit
    Meda, Rohan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (02): : 53 - 55
  • [2] Attribution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis as an Etiology of Cirrhosis for Clinical Trials Eligibility: Recommendations From the Multi-stakeholder Liver Forum
    Noureddin, Mazen
    Chan, Jean L.
    Barradas, Katherine
    Dimick-Santos, Lara
    Schabel, Elmer
    Omokaro, Stephanie O.
    Anania, Frank A.
    Myers, Robert P.
    Miller, Veronica
    Sanyal, Arun J.
    Chalasani, Naga
    Anania, Frank A.
    Bajaj, Jasmohan
    Barradas, Katherine
    Berzigotti, Annalisa
    Birman, Pascal
    Bosch, Jaime
    Brower, Ashley
    Calboli, Dania
    Chalasani, Naga
    Chan, Jean L.
    Charlton, William
    Dickinson, Klara
    Dimick-Santos, Lara
    Filozof, Claudia
    Forsgren, Mikael F.
    Fuchs, Michael
    Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe
    Gonzalez-Abraldes, Juan
    Gruss, Hans-Juergen
    Hansen, Morten
    Hosman, Suneil
    Imperial, Joanne
    Jones, David
    Lalazar, Gadi
    Leinhard, Olof Dahlqvist
    Lyons, Erica
    McColgan, Brian
    Mehta, Ruby
    Mesenbrink, Peter
    Miller, Veronica
    Myers, Rob
    Noureddin, Mazen
    Omokaro, Stephanie O.
    Pei, Veronica
    Ratziu, Vlad
    Regev, Arie
    Riccio, Robert
    Sanyal, Arun
    Schabel, Elmer
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 159 (02) : 422 - +
  • [3] A Multi-Stakeholder Process to Transform a Community-based Screening and Referral Program to Implement Evidence-Based Depression Care
    Pepin, Renee
    Hoyt, Jessica
    Seifert, Bernadette
    Bartels, Stephen J.
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-INFORMED SOCIAL WORK, 2016, 13 (04): : 362 - 372
  • [4] Prioritizing evidence-based practices for acute respiratory distress syndrome using digital data: an iterative multi-stakeholder process
    Ervin, Jennifer N.
    Dibble, Millie R.
    Rentes, Victor C.
    Sjoding, Michael W.
    Gong, Michelle N.
    Hough, Catherine L.
    Iwashyna, Theodore J.
    Sales, Anne E.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [5] Prioritizing evidence-based practices for acute respiratory distress syndrome using digital data: an iterative multi-stakeholder process
    Jennifer N. Ervin
    Millie R. Dibble
    Victor C. Rentes
    Michael W. Sjoding
    Michelle N. Gong
    Catherine L. Hough
    Theodore J. Iwashyna
    Anne E. Sales
    Implementation Science, 17
  • [6] Utility-Based Multi-Stakeholder Recommendations By Multi-Objective Optimization
    Zheng, Yong
    Pu, Aviana
    2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE (WI 2018), 2018, : 128 - 135
  • [7] A Core Outcome Set for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Development and Recommendations for Implementation in Clinical Practice Through an International Multi-stakeholder Consensus Process
    Fierens, Liselotte
    Carney, Nicholas
    Novacek, Gottfried
    van der Woude, C. Janneke
    Siegmund, Britta
    Casellas, Francesc
    Borruel, Natalia
    Huberts, Anouk S.
    Sonnenberg, Elena
    Gerold, Nathalie
    Primas, Christian
    Hedin, Charlotte R. H.
    Stamm, Tanja
    Julsgaard, Mette
    Fiorino, Gionata
    Radice, Simona
    Zini, Michela Luciana Luisa
    Gross, Evelyn
    Sander, Cornelia
    Arijs, Ingrid
    Vakouftsi, Vasiliki-Rafaela
    Koltai, Tunde
    Charlafti, Ilias
    Ferrante, Marc
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2023, 18 (10): : 1583 - 1595
  • [8] Digital endpoints in clinical trials: emerging themes from a multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event
    Tackney, Mia S.
    Steele, Amber
    Newman, Joseph
    Fritzsche, Marie-Christine
    Lucivero, Federica
    Khadjesari, Zarnie
    Lynch, Jennifer
    Abbott, Rosemary A.
    Barber, Vicki S.
    Carpenter, James R.
    Copsey, Bethan
    Davies, Elin H.
    Dixon, William G.
    Fox, Lisa
    Gonzalez, Javier
    Griffiths, Jessica
    Hinchliffe, Chloe H. L.
    Kolanko, Magdalena A.
    McGagh, Dylan
    Rodriguez, Aryelly
    Roussos, George
    So, Karen B. E.
    Stanton, Louise
    Toshner, Mark
    Varian, Frances
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Yimer, Belay B.
    Villar, Sofia S.
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [9] Multi-stakeholder sessions on major innovation topics in rare disease clinical trials
    Bodden, Daniel
    Schoenen, Stefanie
    Wied, Stephanie
    Verbeeck, Johan
    Dirani, Maya
    Daya, Hiba Abou
    Heussen, Nicole
    Molenberghs, Geert
    Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter
    Nabbout, Rima
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [10] Evidence-based recommendations for blinding in surgical trials
    Probst, Pascal
    Zaschke, Steffen
    Heger, Patrick
    Harnoss, Julian C.
    Huettner, Felix J.
    Mihaljevic, Andre L.
    Knebel, Phillip
    Diener, Markus K.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2019, 404 (03) : 273 - 284