A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews

被引：4
|
作者：
Jadad, AR [1 ]
Cook, DJ [1 ]
Browman, GP [1 ]
机构：
[1] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT MED,HAMILTON,ON,CANADA
来源：
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 1997年 / 156卷 / 10期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS ARE BECOMING prominent tools to guide health care decisions. As the number of published systematic reviews increases, it is common to find more than 1 systematic review addressing the same or a very similar therapeutic question. Despite the promise for systematic reviews to resolve conflicting results of primary studies, conflicts among reviews are now emerging. Such conflicts produce difficulties for decision-makers (including clinicians, policy-makers, researchers I and patients) who rely on these reviews to help them make choices among alternative interventions when experts and the results of trials disagree. The authors provide an adjunct decision tool - a decision algorithm - to help decision-makers select from among discordant reviews.
引用
收藏
页码：1411 / 1416
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery
    Esene, Ignatius
    Tantengco, Ourlad Alzeus G.
    Robertson, Faith C.
    Still, Megan E. H.
    Ukachukwu, Alvan-Emeka K.
    Baticulon, Ronnie E.
    Barthelemy, Ernest J.
    Perez-Chadid, Daniela
    Lippa, Laura
    Silva, Ana Cristina Veiga
    Jokonya, Luxwell
    Hassani, Fahd D.
    Nicolosi, Federico
    Takoutsing, Berjo D.
    Ntalaja, Jeff
    Hoz, Samer S.
    Kalangu, Kazadi K. N.
    Dechambenoit, Gilbert
    Servadei, Franco
    El Abbadi, Najia
    Park, Kee B.
    Kolias, Angelos
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [2] A practical guide to interpreting and applying systematic reviews of qualitative studies in rheumatology
    Sumpton, Daniel
    Kelly, Ayano
    Tunnicliffe, David
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Guha, Chandana
    Hassett, Geraldine
    Tong, Allison
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2021, 24 (01) : 28 - 35
  • [3] Interpreting the results of systematic reviews
    Clarke, Mike
    SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2008, 45 (03) : 176 - 180
  • [4] Discordant Systematic Reviews: Which to Believe?
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Norvell, Daniel C.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (02) : 237 - 239
  • [5] A guide to systematic reviews
    Needleman, IG
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 29 : 6 - 9
  • [6] Reporting and interpreting results of systematic reviews
    L Harvey
    J J Wyndaele
    Spinal Cord, 2009, 47 : 777 - 777
  • [7] Reporting and interpreting results of systematic reviews
    Harvey, L.
    Wyndaele, J. J.
    SPINAL CORD, 2009, 47 (11) : 777 - 777
  • [8] A Guide for Systematic Reviews: PRISMA
    Selcuk, Ayse Adin
    TURKISH ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 57 (01) : 57 - 58
  • [9] Systematic reviews as a tool for planning and interpreting trials
    Bath, Philip M. W.
    Gray, Laura J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2009, 4 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [10] Interpreting systematic reviews: Sometimes, more is better
    Craik, Rebecca L.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 86 (07): : 910 - 911
12345