Hypertonic Saline Versus Isotonic Saline in Septic Shock (Effects on Morbidity, Mortality, and Clinical Outcome)

被引:1
|
作者
Effat, Hassan S. [1 ]
Ramadan, Sayed S. [1 ]
Mokhtar, Mohamed S. [1 ]
Ibrahim, Moataz M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Crit Care Med Dept, Cairo, Egypt
来源
关键词
hypertonic saline 3%; septic shock; RESUSCITATION; TRAUMA; DEXTRAN;
D O I
10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000023
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Septic shock remains an impatient cause of morbidity and mortality. A cascade of inflammatory mediators released cause misdistribution of blood flow and organ perfusion. Early restitution of the circulation by fluid administration either crystalloid or colloid solution improve tissue oxygen delivery and increase survival. Aim of work: This study is a prospective randomized single center study its main objective is to investigate the therapeutic value of hypertonic saline in patients with septic shock. Patients and methods: Forty critically ill patients admitted with septic shock divided into two groups, the first group received isotonic saline and hydroxylthyl (control group) starch, while the second received hypertonic saline 3% in addition to isotonicsaline and hydroyethyl starch. Results: Our study results showed that hypertonic saline administration in septic shock patients is safe and can be used as an adjuvant resuscitation fluid therapy as it has a rapid and prolonged effect on those patients hemodynamics or plus it showed significant anti-inflammatory action and also it improve all cardiac functions although this improvement was transient as was the improvement in mortality, intensive care unit stay, need for mechanical ventilator use of inotropes and vasopressors and the scoring system evaluation. Discussion: Hypertonic saline 3% is safe and can be used in resuscitation of septic shock patients.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE TREATMENT OF SHOCK DUE TO SALT DEPLETION - COMPARISON OF THE HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ISOTONIC SALINE, OF HYPERTONIC SALINE, AND OF ISOTONIC GLUCOSE SOLUTIONS
    DANOWSKI, TS
    WINKLER, AW
    ELKINTON, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1946, 25 (01): : 130 - 138
  • [2] RESUSCITATION FROM SEPTIC SHOCK WITH HYPERTONIC SALINE
    LUYPAERT, P
    DEBOELPAEPE, C
    DOMB, M
    VANDERLINDEN, P
    BLECIC, S
    VINCENT, JL
    [J]. CIRCULATORY SHOCK, 1986, 19 (01) : 128 - 128
  • [3] No room for hyperoxia or hypertonic saline in septic shock
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    [J]. LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (03): : 158 - 159
  • [4] Isotonic saline or hypertonic saline: which is best for sinusitis?
    Karadag, A
    Kurtaran, H
    Tekin, O
    Uraldi, C
    Aydogan, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2004, 53 (08): : 637 - 637
  • [5] Hypertonic Versus Normal Saline as Initial Fluid Bolus in Pediatric Septic Shock
    Abhishek Chopra
    Virendra Kumar
    Ashok Dutta
    [J]. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2011, 78 : 833 - 837
  • [6] Hypertonic Versus Normal Saline as Initial Fluid Bolus in Pediatric Septic Shock
    Chopra, Abhishek
    Kumar, Virendra
    Dutta, Ashok
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2011, 78 (07): : 833 - 837
  • [7] Hypertonic saline dextran in the treatment of septic shock in sheep
    Sun, QH
    Nguyen, N
    Hoang, AD
    Orellana-Jimenez, CEA
    Rogiers, P
    Vincent, JL
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : A89 - A89
  • [8] Hypertonic Lactate Is Inferior To Hypertonic Saline In Resuscitation From Septic Shock
    Su, F.
    He, X.
    Xie, K.
    Orbegozo, D.
    Donadello, K.
    Taccone, F. S.
    De Backer, D.
    Vincent, J. -L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 189
  • [9] EFFECTS OF HYPERTONIC SALINE IN INTESTINAL SHOCK
    HAGLIND, E
    HALJAMAE, H
    [J]. CIRCULATORY SHOCK, 1988, 24 (04) : 243 - 244
  • [10] Hypertonic Saline Versus Isotonic Saline Nasal Irrigation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kanjanawasee, Dichapong
    Seresirikachorn, Kachorn
    Chitsuthipakorn, Wirach
    Snidvongs, Kornkiat
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2018, 32 (04) : 269 - 279