Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive

被引:39
|
作者
Atalay, Cansu [1 ]
Ozgunaltay, Gul [1 ]
Yazici, Ayse Ruya [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Etch-and-rinse; Self-etch; Selective-etch; Universal adhesives; Non-carious cervical lesions; NONCARIOUS CERVICAL LESIONS; ETCH-AND-RINSE; CLASS-II RESTORATIONS; SELF-ETCH; BONDING PERFORMANCE; MULTIMODE ADHESIVE; SCLEROTIC DENTIN; ENAMEL; RESIN; COMPOSITE;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-019-03052-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate and compare the performance of a universal adhesive with different adhesive strategies in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) over a 36-month period. Material and method One hundred sixty-five NCCLs in 35 patients (13 female, 22 male) with at least 3 lesions each were included in this study. Three groups were formed according to the adhesive strategy used (n = 55): selective-etch mode, etch-and-rinse mode, or self-etch mode of a universal adhesive, Single Bond Universal. The same nanofilled resin composite, Filtek Ultimate, was used for all restorations by a single operator. The restorations were evaluated by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months in accordance with the modified USPHS criteria. The chi-square test was used for intergroup comparison and Cochran's Q test for intragroup comparison (proportional to = 5%). Results At 36 months, the recall rate was 98.1% and three restorations, one from each group, had failed because of retention loss (P > 0.05). The self-etch mode group showed 17 bravo scores for both marginal staining and marginal adaptation after 3 years, which was significantly different from the selective-etch and etch-and-rinse groups (P < 0.05). For all groups, the only statistically significant difference was found when baseline and 36-month evaluations were compared in terms of marginal staining (P = 0.000). When the marginal adaptation values at 36 months were compared with those at the baseline, statistically significant differences were found in the etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode groups (P < 0.05). Neither secondary caries nor postoperative sensitivity was observed at any recall. Conclusion All adhesive modes showed similar retention rates. Although all restorations were clinically acceptable, restorations in self-etch mode showed less satisfying performance for marginal staining and marginal adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:1569 / 1578
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive
    Cansu Atalay
    Gul Ozgunaltay
    Ayse Ruya Yazici
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, 24 : 1569 - 1578
  • [2] Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial
    Barceleiro, Marcos O.
    Lopes, Leticia S.
    Tardem, Chane
    Calazans, Fernanda S.
    Matos, Thalita P.
    Reis, Alessandra
    Calixto, Abraham Lincoln
    Loguercio, Alessandro D.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (06) : 4337 - 4350
  • [3] Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial
    Marcos O. Barceleiro
    Leticia S. Lopes
    Chane Tardem
    Fernanda S. Calazans
    Thalita P. Matos
    Alessandra Reis
    Abraham Lincoln Calixto
    Alessandro D. Loguercio
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 4337 - 4350
  • [4] A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 6-Month Clinical Evaluation
    Mena-Serrano, Alexandra
    Kose, Carlos
    De Paula, Eloisa Andrade
    Tay, Lidia Yileng
    Reis, Alessandra
    Loguercio, Alessandro D.
    Perdigao, Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 25 (01) : 55 - 69
  • [5] A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-Month Clinical Evaluation
    Perdigao, J.
    Kose, C.
    Mena-Serrano, A. P.
    De Paula, E. A.
    Tay, L. Y.
    Reis, A.
    Loguercio, A. D.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 39 (02) : 113 - 127
  • [6] Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations
    Yazici, A. R.
    Antonson, S. A.
    Kutuk, Z. B.
    Ergin, E.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 42 (05) : 478 - 485
  • [7] Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial
    Yazici, Ayse Ruya
    Tekce, Aybuke Uslu
    Kutuk, Zeynep Bilge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 117
  • [8] A 48-month Clinical Evaluation of Fissure Sealants Placed With Different Adhesive Systems
    Karaman, E.
    Yazici, A. R.
    Tuncer, D.
    Firat, E.
    Unluer, S.
    Baseren, M.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 38 (04) : 369 - 375
  • [9] Sleeping position and health status of children at six-, eighteen- and thirty-six-month development
    Lung, For-Wey
    Shu, Bih-Ching
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2011, 32 (02) : 713 - 718
  • [10] Randomized trial of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease Thirty-six-month outcomes
    Weaver, Frances M.
    Follett, Kenneth A.
    Stern, Matthew
    Luo, Ping
    Harris, Crystal L.
    Hur, Kwan
    Marks, William J., Jr.
    Rothlind, Johannes
    Sagher, Oren
    Moy, Claudia
    Pahwa, Rajesh
    Burchiel, Kim
    Hogarth, Penelope
    Lai, Eugene C.
    Duda, John E.
    Holloway, Kathryn
    Samii, Ali
    Horn, Stacy
    Bronstein, Jeff M.
    Stoner, Gatana
    Starr, Philip A.
    Simpson, Richard
    Baltuch, Gordon
    De Salles, Antonio
    Huang, Grant D.
    Reda, Domenic J.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2012, 79 (01) : 55 - 65