THE CAPABILITIES-BASED PLANNING PROCESS

被引:0
|
作者
Asandului, Iulia-Manuela
机构
关键词
capability; planning; objective; system;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Nowadays, the true face of our next adversary or the exact method of engagement is yet unknown. The threat may come from terrorists, but it could come in form of cyber warfare, a traditional conflict or a new form of attack. A world of uncertain threats requires agile partners and organizations with a portfolio of capabilities to draw from. CBP is a systematic approach to force development that aims to advise on the most appropriate force options to meet government priorities. CBP intends to manage risks, set specific preparedness goals and priorities, make investment choices and evaluate preparedness results. CBP uses intelligence, strategic studies and experiences to describe potential future threats and specific event or longer-term scenarios. The scenarios are used to define specific capabilities through an analytical framework starting with mission objectives and measures of strategic and operational success and ending with an assessment of options on factors such as risk. It starts by asking questions regarding what do we need to do rather than what equipment are we replacing. A link between strategy and programs, operational planning and force planning is needed. In this context, CBP could generate flexible, robust forces that offer capabilities to meet a wide variety of threats. Such a complex process could provide a rational basis for making decisions on future acquisitions and it could make planning more responsive to economic constraints and risk. The force options developed should meet strategic objectives, minimize cost and risk and comply with other constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 469
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Capabilities-Based "Confusion": Why Capabilities-Based Planning Systems Struggle*
    Young, Thomas-Durell
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF DEFENSE ANALYSIS, 2021, 33 (01): : 95 - 118
  • [2] CAPABILITIES-BASED DEFENSE PLANNING - THE AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE
    YOUNG, TD
    [J]. ARMED FORCES & SOCIETY, 1995, 21 (03) : 349 - &
  • [3] Capabilities-based plan recognition
    Suzic, Robert
    Svenson, Pontus
    [J]. 2006 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION, VOLS 1-4, 2006, : 776 - 782
  • [4] CAPABILITIES-BASED COMPETITION - REPLY
    STALK, G
    EVANS, P
    SHULMAN, LE
    [J]. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1992, 70 (03) : 170 - &
  • [5] Fleet Capabilities-Based Assessment
    Doerry, Norbert
    Fireman, Howard
    [J]. NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2009, 121 (04) : 107 - 116
  • [6] A Capabilities-Based Account of Wellbeing
    Koch, Peter
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (03): : 85 - 87
  • [7] A Framework for a Capabilities-Based Approach to Copyright
    Jandhyala, Megha
    [J]. REVISTA DIREITO GV, 2021, 17 (02)
  • [8] Distributed Capabilities-based DDoS Defense
    Jog, Manjiri
    Natu, Maitreya
    Shelke, Sushama
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING (ICPC), 2015,
  • [9] A capabilities-based model for adaptive organizations
    DeLoach, Scott A.
    Oyenan, Walamitien H.
    Matson, Eric T.
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2008, 16 (01) : 13 - 56
  • [10] A capabilities-based model for adaptive organizations
    Scott A. DeLoach
    Walamitien H. Oyenan
    Eric T. Matson
    [J]. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2008, 16 : 13 - 56