Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

被引:50
|
作者
Boeck, Stefan [1 ]
Wilkowski, Ralf [3 ]
Bruns, Christiane J. [2 ]
Issels, Rolf D. [1 ,4 ]
Schulz, Christoph [1 ]
Moosmann, Nicolas [1 ]
Laessig, Dorit [1 ]
Haas, Michael [1 ]
Golf, Alexander [5 ]
Heinemann, Volker [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 3, Klinikum Grosshadern, DE-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Surg, Klinikum Grosshadern, DE-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Klin Bad Trissl, Oberaudorf, Germany
[4] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Neuherberg, Germany
[5] Klinikum Stuttgart, Dept Med 1, Buergerhosp, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
capecitabine; chemotherapy; gemcitabine; pancreatic cancer;
D O I
10.1159/000127413
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To date, no standard regimen for salvage chemotherapy after gemcitabine (Gem) failure has been defined for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Oral capecitabine (Cap) has shown promising activity in first-line chemotherapy trials in PC patients. Methods: Within a prospective single-center study, Cap was offered to patients who had already received at least 1 previous treatment regimen containing full-dose Gem (as a single agent, as part of a combination chemotherapy regimen or sequentially within a chemoradiotherapy protocol). Cap was administered orally at a dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest. Study endpoints were objective tumor response rate by imaging criteria (according to RECIST), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) tumor marker response, time to progression, overall survival and toxicity. Results: A median of 3 treatment cycles (range 1-36) was given to 39 patients. After a median follow-up of 6.6 months, 27 patients were evaluable for response: no complete or partial responses were observed, but 15 patients (39%) had stable disease. A CA19-9 reduction of >20% after 2 cycles of Cap was documented in 6 patients (15%). Median time to progression was 2.3 months (range 0.5-45.1) and median overall survival (since start of Cap treatment) was 7.6 months (range 0.7-45.1). Predominant grade 2 and 3 toxicities (per patient analysis) were hand-foot syndrome 28% (13% grade 3); anemia 23%; leg edema 15%; diarrhea 13%; nausea/vomiting 10%, and leukocytopenia 10%. Conclusion: Single-agent Cap is a safe treatment option for Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC. Further evaluation of Cap in controlled clinical trials of Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC is recommended. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 227
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A single-center study
    Boeck, S. H.
    Wilkowski, R.
    Bruns, C. J.
    Issels, R. D.
    Schulz, C.
    Moosmann, N.
    Laessig, D.
    Golf, A.
    Heinemann, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [2] Second-line therapy in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Boeck, Stefan
    Heinemann, Volker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (07) : 1178 - 1179
  • [3] Second-line therapy in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer - Reply
    Kulke, Matthew H.
    Fuchs, Charles S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (07) : 1179 - 1179
  • [4] A phase II study of capecitabine plus docetaxel in gemcitabine-pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: CapTere
    Heloisa P. Soares
    Soley Bayraktar
    Marcelo Blaya
    Gilberto Lopes
    Jaime Merchan
    Jessica Macintyre
    Carlos Mayo
    Mark R. Green
    Orlando Silva
    Joe Levi
    Gail Walker
    Caio M. Rocha-Lima
    [J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2014, 73 : 839 - 845
  • [5] A phase II study of capecitabine plus docetaxel in gemcitabine-pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: CapTere
    Soares, Heloisa P.
    Bayraktar, Soley
    Blaya, Marcelo
    Lopes, Gilberto
    Merchan, Jaime
    Macintyre, Jessica
    Mayo, Carlos
    Green, Mark R.
    Silva, Orlando
    Levi, Joe
    Walker, Gail
    Rocha-Lima, Caio M.
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 73 (04) : 839 - 845
  • [6] Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Altwegg, Romain
    Ychou, Marc
    Guillaumon, Vanessa
    Thezenas, Simon
    Senesse, Pierre
    Flori, Nicolas
    Mazard, Thibault
    Caillo, Ludovic
    Faure, Stephanie
    Samalin, Emmanuelle
    Assenat, Eric
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (12) : 1357 - 1364
  • [7] Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Romain Altwegg
    Marc Ychou
    Vanessa Guillaumon
    Simon Thezenas
    Pierre Senesse
    Nicolas Flori
    Thibault Mazard
    Ludovic Caillo
    Stéphanie Faure
    Emmanuelle Samalin
    Eric Assenat
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, (12) : 1357 - 1364
  • [8] A phase II study of docetaxel in combination with gefitinib in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Ignatiadis, M.
    Polyzos, A.
    Stathopoulos, G. P.
    Tselepatiotis, E.
    Christophyllakis, Ch.
    Argyraki, K.
    Androulakis, N.
    Vardakis, N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 311 - 311
  • [9] What Else in Gemcitabine-Pretreated Advanced Pancreatic Cancer? An Update of Second Line Therapies
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Borgonovo, Karen
    Ghilardi, Mara
    Cabiddu, Mary
    Barni, Sandro
    [J]. REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 5 (01) : 43 - 56
  • [10] A Multicenter phase II study of docetaxel in combination with gefitinib in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Ignatiadis, Michail
    Polyzos, Aris
    Stathopoulos, George P.
    Tselepatiotis, Evangelos
    Christophylakis, Charalambos
    Kalbakis, Kostas
    Vamvakas, Lambros
    Kotsakis, Athanasios
    Potamianou, Anna
    Georgoulias, Vassilis
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2006, 71 (3-4) : 159 - 163