BUT WILL IT PRINT?: ASSESSING STUDENT USE OF DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND EXPLORING ITS EFFECT ON DESIGN PERFORMANCE AND MANUFACTURABILITY

被引:0
|
作者
Prabhu, Rohan [1 ]
Miller, Scarlett R. [2 ]
Simpson, Timothy W. [2 ]
Meisel, Nicholas A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Mech Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Engn Design, Ind Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Engn Design, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
design for additive manufacturing; additive manufacturing education; manufacturability; SURFACE QUALITY; COST ESTIMATION; DEPOSITION; STEREOLITHOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PARTS; FDM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables engineers to improve the functionality and performance of their designs by adding complexity at little to no additional cost. However, AMprocesses also exhibit certain unique limitations, such as the presence of support material, which must be accounted for to ensure that designs can be manufacturedfeasibly and cost-effectively. Given these unique process characteristics, it is important for an AMtrained workforce to be able to incorporate both opportunistic and restrictive design for AM (DfAM) considerations into the design process. While AM/DfAM educational interventions have been discussed in the literature, limited research has investigated the effect of these interventions on students' use of DfAM. Furthermore, limited research has explored how DfAM use affects the performance of students' AM designs. This research explores this gap through an experimental study with 123 undergraduate students. Specifically, participants were exposed to either restrictive DfAM or dual DfAM (both opportunistic and restrictive) and then asked to participate in an AM design challenge. The students' final designs were evaluated for (1) performance with respect the design objectives and constraints, and (2) the use of the various aspects of DfAM. The results showed that the use of certain DfAM considerations, such as minimum feature size and support material mass, successfully predicted the performance of the AM designs. Further; while the variations in DfAM education did not influence the performance of the AM designs, it did have an effect on the students ' use of certain DfAM concepts in their final designs. These results highlight the influence ofDfAM education in bringing about an increase in students' use of DfAM. Moreover, the results demonstrate the potential influence of DfAM in reducing build time and build material of the students' AM designs, thus improving design performance and manufacturability.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] But Will It Build? Assessing Student Engineering Designers' Use of Design for Additive Manufacturing Considerations in Design Outcomes
    Prabhu, Rohan
    Miller, Scarlett R.
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Meisel, Nicholas A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2020, 142 (09)
  • [2] A Design for Additive Manufacturing Ontology to Support Manufacturability Analysis
    Kim, Samyeon
    Rosen, David W.
    Witherell, Paul
    Ko, Hyunwoong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 19 (04)
  • [3] A DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING ONTOLOGY TO SUPPORT MANUFACTURABILITY ANALYSIS
    Kim, Samyeon
    Rosen, David W.
    Witherell, Paul
    Ko, Hyunwoong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2A, 2018,
  • [4] DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING USING A GRAPH BASED APPROACH
    Ranjan, Rajit
    Samant, Rutuja
    Anand, Sam
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 10TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 1, 2015,
  • [5] Design for additive manufacturing and its effect on the performance characteristics of a control valve trim
    Singh, Dharminder
    Charlton, Matthew
    Asim, Taimoor
    Mishra, Rakesh
    [J]. International Journal of COMADEM, 2019, 22 (02): : 59 - 67
  • [6] Selection methodology for additive manufacturing processes considering design, material, and manufacturability
    Goala, Suraj
    Sarkar, Prabir
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (01) : 15 - 32
  • [7] COMPLEX SOLUTIONS FOR COMPLEX PROBLEMS?: EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF TASK COMPLEXITY ON STUDENT USE OF DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND CREATIVITY
    Prabhu, Rohan
    Miller, Scarlett R.
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Meisel, Nicholas A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 3, 2020,
  • [8] Design for manufacturing: use of a spreadsheet model of manufacturability to optimize product design and development
    James La Trobe-Bateman
    David Wild
    [J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2003, 14 : 107 - 117
  • [9] Design for manufacturing: use of a spreadsheet model of manufacturability to optimize product design and development
    La Trobe-Bateman, J
    Wild, D
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND CONCURRENT ENGINEERING, 2003, 14 (02): : 107 - 117
  • [10] Exploring creativity management of design for additive manufacturing
    Lindwall, Angelica
    Nilsson, Asa Wikberg
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DESIGN CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION, 2021, 9 (04) : 217 - 235