Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study

被引:339
|
作者
Yunam Cuan-Baltazar, Jose [1 ]
Jose Munoz-Perez, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Robledo-Vega, Carolina [1 ]
Fernanda Perez-Zepeda, Maria [1 ]
Soto-Vega, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Anahuac Puebla, Med Sch, Av Orion Sn Colonia Country Club, Cholula 72810, Mexico
[2] Benemerita Univ Autonoma Puebla, Fac Med, Puebla, Mexico
来源
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
HONcode; JAMA benchmarks; DISCERN instrument; Wuhan coronavirus; COVID-19; nCoV; epidemiology; health information seeking; information quality; misinformation; public health; WORLD-WIDE-WEB; PATIENT INFORMATION; HEALTH INFORMATION; QUALITY; 2019-NCOV; WUHAN;
D O I
10.2196/18444
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was a trending topic on the internet, using validated instruments and relating the quality of information to its readability. Methods: The search was based on the term "Wuhan Coronavirus" on the Google website (February 6, 2020). At the search time, the terms "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2" (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) did not exist. Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the DISCERN instrument, and Google ranking. Results: The first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1.8% (n=2) of the websites had the HONcode seal. The JAMA benchmark showed that 39.1% (n=43) of the websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool, and only 10.0% (11/110) of the websites had the four quality criteria required by JAMA. The DISCERN score showed that 70.0% (n=77) of the websites were evaluated as having a low score and none were rated as having a high score. Conclusions: Nonhealth personnel and the scientific community need to be aware about the quality of the information they read and produce, respectively. The Wuhan coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media, and the misinformation was obtained by users from the internet. The use of the internet has a risk to public health, and, in cases like this, the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information on the internet without censuring the population. By February 6, 2020, no quality information was available on the internet about COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 184
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prevalence of Misinformation and Factchecks on the COVID-19 Pandemic in 35 Countries: Observational Infodemiology Study
    Cha, Meeyoung
    Cha, Chiyoung
    Singh, Karandeep
    Lima, Gabriel
    Ahn, Yong-Yeol
    Kulshrestha, Juhi
    Varol, Onur
    [J]. JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [2] Medical Misinformation in Polish on the World Wide Web During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: Infodemiology Study
    Chlabicz, Malgorzata
    Nabozny, Aleksandra
    Koszelew, Jolanta
    Laguna, Wojciech
    Szpakowicz, Anna
    Sowa, Pawel
    Budny, Wojciech
    Guziejko, Katarzyna
    Rog-Makal, Magdalena
    Pancewicz, Slawomir
    Kondrusik, Maciej
    Czupryna, Piotr
    Cudowska, Beata
    Lebensztejn, Dariusz
    Moniuszko-Malinowska, Anna
    Wierzbicki, Adam
    Kaminski, Karol A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [3] Charting the Information and Misinformation Landscape to Characterize Misinfodemics on Social Media: COVID-19 Infodemiology Study at a Planetary Scale
    Chen, Emily
    Jiang, Julie
    Chang, Ho-Chun Herbert
    Muric, Goran
    Ferrara, Emilio
    [J]. JMIR INFODEMIOLOGY, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [4] Misinformation and COVID-19
    Hussaini, Najia
    Varon, Joseph
    [J]. CURRENT RESPIRATORY MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2021, 17 (02) : 59 - 59
  • [5] An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter
    Shahi, Gautam Kishore
    Dirkson, Anne
    Majchrzak, Tim A.
    [J]. Online Social Networks and Media, 2021, 22
  • [6] COVID-19 and the Gendered Use of Emojis on Twitter: Infodemiology Study
    Al-Rawi, Ahmed
    Siddiqi, Maliha
    Morgan, Rosemary
    Vandan, Nimisha
    Smith, Julia
    Wenham, Clare
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [7] Internet Searches for Terms Related to Child Maltreatment During COVID-19: Infodemiology Approach
    Riem, Madelon M. E.
    De Carli, Pietro
    Guo, Jing
    Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.
    van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
    Lodder, Paul
    [J]. JMIR PEDIATRICS AND PARENTING, 2021, 4 (03):
  • [8] COVID-19 misinformation is widespread
    不详
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2022, 122 (02)
  • [9] MISINFORMATION IN THE COVID-19 ERA
    Kling, Sharon
    [J]. CURRENT ALLERGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 34 (03) : 174 - 177
  • [10] Misinformation in the COVID-19 era
    Toth, Gabor
    Spiotta, Alejandro M.
    Hirsch, Joshua A.
    Fiorella, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2020, 12 (09) : 829 - 830