The effect of runway roughness on aircraft operations

被引:0
|
作者
Gerardi, T [1 ]
机构
[1] APR Consultants Inc, Medway, OH 45341 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Most airport owners & operators think about runway roughness only when complaints from pilots and passengers start occurring. However, there is a recent interest in adding runway ride quality as a part of Pavement Maintenance/Management Systems (PMMS). It is important to monitor airport pavements for smoothness for several reasons. It is known that smooth pavements last longer. Studies show that the dynamic loading of pavements can significantly reduce their life (Gerardi & Johnson, 1994). What is not so well known, is the effect of runway roughness on aircraft operations. Not only can runway roughness increase aircraft stopping distance, it can also be a safety issue, particularly in an aborted takeoff. It also adds fatigue damage to the aircraft by amplifying the Ground-Air-Ground (GAG) fatigue cycle effects. The added fatigue damage is subtle in nature, but its effects are felt as the "aging fleet" approaches their fatigue design lives. This fatigue damage occurs in primary aircraft structure as well as subsystems. This paper presents several case histories of aircraft operations on rough runways that contributed to aircraft incidents. It will describe one case in point where an aborted takeoff on a particular US airport runway could have likely ended in a blown nose landing gear tire or broken nose landing gear strut. This paper also describes a scenario that may have contributed to the TWA Flight 800 disaster. This paper concludes by describing a statement of need to establish a limit on allowable runway and taxiway roughness. This smoothness standard should be based on aircraft ride quality. Pavements would be periodically checked and maintained to that established standard. By maintaining pavements to a "not to exceed" level of roughness, pavement life will be extended. It will also enable aircraft designers to more accurately define the loads experienced over the life of the aircraft, therefore improving the design. In summary, tracking and maintaining smooth pavements is cost effective and is a technology ready for engineering and management use.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:335 / 347
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integration of aircraft ground movements and runway operations
    Guepet, Julien
    Briant, Olivier
    Gayon, Jean-Philippe
    Acuna-Agost, Rodrigo
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2017, 104 : 131 - 149
  • [2] Aircraft taxiing dynamic load induced by runway roughness
    Qian J.
    Pan X.
    Cen Y.
    Liu D.
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41 (20): : 176 - 184and269
  • [3] RANDOM HEAVE-PITCH RESPONSE OF AIRCRAFT TO RUNWAY ROUGHNESS
    KIRK, CL
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1971, 75 (727): : 476 - &
  • [4] Effect of space for runway roughness evaluation
    Liu, Shifu
    Tian, Yu
    Yang, Ge
    Ling, Jianming
    Li, Peilin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2023, 24 (02)
  • [5] INFLUENCE OF RUNWAY ROUGHNESS ON DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF AIRCRAFT AT TAKE-OFF
    DREVET, JP
    AERONAUTIQUE ASTRONAUTIQUE, 1977, (65): : 37 - 42
  • [6] An improved methodology for assessing risk in aircraft operations at airports, applied to runway overruns
    Kirkland, IDL
    Caves, RE
    Humphreys, IM
    Pitfield, DE
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2004, 42 (10) : 891 - 905
  • [7] Runway roughness criteria
    Filarski, JD
    ADVANCING AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS, 2001, : 171 - 180
  • [8] Effect of Aircraft Wheel Load and Configuration on Runway Damages
    Shafabakhsh, Gholam Ali
    Kashi, Ehsan
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 59 (01): : 85 - 94
  • [9] Assessment of aircraft landing gear cumulative stroke to develop a new runway roughness evaluation index
    Liu, Shifu
    Ling, Jianming
    Tian, Yu
    Qian, Jinsong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2022, 23 (10) : 3609 - 3620
  • [10] Restoration of Runway Roughness.
    Zipkes, E.
    Strassen- und Tiefbau, 1975, 29 (07): : 22 - 27