DEMOCRACY AND THE DELIBERATIVE CONCEIT

Over recent years support for deliberative democracy as a regulative ideal against which political and economic institutions should be judged has become the dominant tradition within political theory. Deliberative democrats such as Amy Guttman and Dennis Thompson argue that deliberative public decision making would bring with it important epistemological and ethical gains. Closer inspection of these claims, however, suggests that deliberative democratic arrangements are not only impractical but are fundamentally at odds with the epistemic and ethical goals that their supporters seek to advance. Arrangements based on oexito rather than ovoiceo may be better placed to meet these challenges in a world characterized by complexity and conflicting moral values.