Risk Factors and Survival Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation

被引:18
|
作者
Dougherty, Mark C. [1 ]
Woodroffe, Royce W. [1 ]
Wilson, Saul [1 ]
Gillies, George T. [2 ]
Howard, Matthew A., III [1 ]
Carnahan, Ryan M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Epidemiol, Iowa City, IA USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2021年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Explantation; Kaplan-Meier; spinal cord stimulator; surgery; survival analysis; BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; CHRONIC PAIN; PREDICTORS; SUCCESS; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1111/ner.13173
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective The treatment failure rate for spinal cord stimulators (SCS) remains unacceptably high, with reports of removal in up to 30% of patients. The purpose of this study is to perform survival and multivariate regression analyses of patients who have undergone SCS explantation in order to identify patient characteristics that may predict treatment failure. Materials and Methods We identified 253 patients who underwent SCS placement using current procedural terminology codes in a private health insurance data base spanning 2003-2016. Patient demographics, opioid use, surgical indications, as well as comorbidities were noted. At least 6 months of continuous claims data before and after implantation were required for inclusion. Patients who underwent explantation were defined as those who underwent removal without replacement within 90 days and had at least 90 days of continuous insurance eligibility following removal. Those who underwent removal for infectious reasons were identified with corresponding diagnosis codes. Results Of the 252 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 17 (6.7%) underwent SCS explantation. Median follow-up time was 2.0 years. Of those who had their system explanted, six patients (2.8%) had their systems removed for infection and 11 (4.3%) for noninfectious reasons. Bivariate analysis revealed that younger age and tobacco use were associated with an increased likelihood of explantation. The Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that younger age, tobacco use, and the presence of "other" mental health disorders were predictive of explantation. Conclusions In a cohort of SCS patients from multiple institutions, this study demonstrates that explantation for noninfectious reasons is more likely in younger patients, tobacco users, and those with certain psychiatric conditions. With an estimated 10% of patients opting to have their devices removed within 5 years of implantation, refining the ability of clinicians to predict who will see benefit from SCS treatment remains necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors Contributing Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation
    Ponce, Francisco A.
    Graham, Dakota
    Lambert, Margaret
    Mirzadeh, Zaman
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 91 - 91
  • [2] Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Case Series
    Moeschler, Susan M.
    Sanders, Rebecca A.
    Hooten, W. Michael
    Hoelzer, Bryan C.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (04): : 285 - 288
  • [3] Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation: Motives for Removal of Surgically Placed Paddle Systems
    Dupre, Derrick A.
    Tomycz, Nestor
    Whiting, Donald
    Oh, Michael
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (04) : 500 - 504
  • [4] Spinal Cord Stimulator Implant Infection Rates and Risk Factors: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Hoelzer, Bryan C.
    Bendel, Mark A.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Eldrige, Jason S.
    Walega, David R.
    Wang, Zhen
    Costandi, Shrif
    Azer, Gerges
    Qu, Wenchun
    Falowski, Steven M.
    Neuman, Stephanie A.
    Moeschler, Susan M.
    Wassef, Catherine
    Kim, Christopher
    Niazi, Tariq
    Saifullah, Taher
    Yee, Brian
    Kim, Chong
    Oryhan, Christine L.
    Rosenow, Joshua M.
    Warren, Daniel T.
    Lerman, Imanuel
    Mora, Ruben
    Hayek, Salim M.
    Hanes, Michael
    Simopoulos, Thomas
    Sharma, Sanjiv
    Gilligan, Chris
    Grace, Warren
    Ade, Timothy
    Mekhail, Nagy A.
    Hunter, John P.
    Choi, Daniel
    Choi, Deborah Y.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (06): : 558 - 562
  • [5] Explantation of Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Devices: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis of a Single-Center 15-Year Experience
    Simopoulos, Thomas
    Aner, Moris
    Sharma, Sanjiv
    Ghosh, Priyanka
    Gill, Jatinder S.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (07) : 1355 - 1361
  • [6] Spinal cord stimulation failure: evaluation of factors underlying hardware explantation
    Patel, Smruti K.
    Gozal, Yair M.
    Saleh, Mohamed S.
    Gibson, Justin L.
    Karsy, Michael
    Mandybur, George T.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 32 (01) : 133 - 138
  • [7] PEDIATRIC SACRAL NERVE STIMULATOR EXPLANTATION DUE TO COMPLICATIONS OR CURE: A SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
    Rensing, Adam
    Szymanski, Konrad
    Dunn, Sally
    King, Shelly
    Cain, Mark
    Whittam, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E760 - E760
  • [8] Spinal Cord Compression Related to Spinal Cord Stimulator
    Wang, Dajie
    Qureshi, Mohammad
    Smith, Joseph
    Khetani, Nicole
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (01) : 212 - 214
  • [9] Dehiscence and Deep Wound Infection After Spinal Cord Stimulator Implant Managed Without Explantation: A Case Report
    Wang, Hank C.
    Auyeung, Andrew
    Aijaz, Tabish
    Candido, Kenneth D.
    Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick
    A & A PRACTICE, 2022, 16 (09): : e01623
  • [10] Spinal Cord Injury Induced by a Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulator
    Falowski, Steven
    Ooi, Yinn Cher
    Sabesan, Arvind
    Sharan, Ashwini
    NEUROMODULATION, 2011, 14 (01): : 34 - 36