Spatial paradigms of lotic diatom distribution: A landscape ecology perspective

被引:76
|
作者
Passy, SI [1 ]
机构
[1] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Biol, US Geol Survey, Troy, NY 12180 USA
关键词
current velocity; diatom; fractal dimension; geostatistics; heterogeneity; patch; periphyton; spatial autocorrelation; stream;
D O I
10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037003370.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Spatial distributional patterns of benthic diatoms and their relation to current velocity were investigated in an unshaded cobble-bottom reach of White Creek (Washington County, NY). On 27 August 1999, diatoms were sampled and current velocity and depth were measured on a regular square sampling grid with a grain size of 0.01 m(2), interval of 0.5 m, and extent of 16 m(2). The relative abundance of the 18 common diatom species enumerated in the 81 samples was subjected to detrended correspondence analysis (P)CIA). The first axis (DCA1) explained 51% of the variance in diatom data and separated the samples according to current regimes. The spa tial autocorrelation of DCA1 sample scores in deposition and erosion regions of White Creek was determined by Moran's I statistic to indicate patch size. In White Creek the patch length of all diatom communities was more than 3.1 m, whereas the patch width was 1m in the deposition region and 0.5 m in the erosion region. There were 5 dominant diatom taxa, Achnanthes minutissima Kutz. et vars, Fragilaria capucina Dezmazieres et vars, F. crotonensis Kitt., Diatoma vulgaris Bory, and Synedra ulna (Nitz.) Ehr. ef vars. The patch length of the dominant species varied from 1 to more than 4.1 m, whereas the patch width, if defined, was 0.5 m. Achnanthes minutissima and F. capucina, the two diatom species with the highest relative abundance, displayed spatially structured patches of low abundance and comparatively random patches of high abundance, suggesting broad scale abiotic control of species performance in low abundance regions and finer scale biotic control of high abundance areas. Another objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that higher current velocities, which generally impede immigration, would increase randomness and complexity (i.e. homogeneity of diatom distributional patterns). The spatial complexity in low versus high velocity transects was determined by calculating the respective fractal dimension (D) of DCA1 scores. D of DCA1 was higher in the higher current velocity transects, suggesting that spatial complexity and homogeneity of diatom communities increased in faster currents. Partial canonical correspondence analysis was conducted on diatom, environmental, and spatial data to assess how much of the variance in species distribution could be attributed to environmental (current velocity and depth) versus spatial factors. The variance of species data, explained by the environment (exclusively current velocity), was 38%; whereas space alone contributed only 10%, indicating that 1) current velocity was the major factor that controlled diatom distribution in streams and 2) there were other spatially dependent variables, most likely biotic, but their role in shaping diatom communities was minor.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 378
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Method for Monitoring the Spatial Distribution of Nutrients from the Perspective of Landscape Ecology
    Zhang, Wenyong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2020, : 182 - 186
  • [2] Differences in the ecology and distribution of lotic pulmonate and prosobranch gastropods
    Brown, KM
    Alexander, JE
    Thorp, JH
    [J]. AMERICAN MALACOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 14 (02) : 91 - 101
  • [3] Cultural characteristics and geospatial distribution of landscape ecology in the perspective of regional culture
    Wanying Yang
    Baogang Lin
    Chao Wen
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (22)
  • [4] Spatial distribution of rare species in lotic habitats
    McCreadie, John W.
    Adler, Peter H.
    [J]. INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2008, 1 (03) : 127 - 134
  • [5] Spatial Distribution of Epiphytic Diatoms on Lotic Bryophytes
    Knapp, Jessica M.
    Lowe, Rex L.
    [J]. SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST, 2009, 8 (02) : 305 - 316
  • [6] Scaling of 'landscapes' in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective
    Wiens, John A.
    Milne, Bruce T.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1989, 3 (02) : 87 - 96
  • [7] STREAM FISH ECOLOGY - A LANDSCAPE PERSPECTIVE
    SCHLOSSER, IJ
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 1991, 41 (10) : 704 - 712
  • [8] Ecosystem management: A landscape ecology perspective
    Jensen, ME
    Bourgeron, P
    Everett, R
    Goodman, I
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1996, 32 (02): : 203 - 216
  • [9] Eighty-year review of the evolution of landscape ecology: from a spatial planning perspective
    Milovanovic, Aleksandra
    Milovanovic Rodic, Danijela
    Maruna, Marija
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2020, 35 (10) : 2141 - 2161
  • [10] Integration of ecosystem services into a conceptual spatial planning framework based on a landscape ecology perspective
    Javier Babí Almenar
    Benedetto Rugani
    Davide Geneletti
    Tim Brewer
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2018, 33 : 2047 - 2059