Relative efficiency of Gaussian stochastic process sampling procedures

被引:12
|
作者
Cameron, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Dept Appl Math Comp Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2003.07.012
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Various methods for sampling stationary, Gaussian stochastic processes are investigated and compared with an emphasis on applications to processes with power law energy spectra. Several approaches are considered, including a Riemann summation using left endpoints, the use of random wave numbers to sample a the spectrum in proportion to the energy it contains, and a combination of the two. The Fourier-wavelet method of Elliott et al. is investigated and compared with other methods, all of which are evaluated in terms of their ability to sample the stochastic process over a large number of decades for a given computational cost. The Fourier-wavelet method has accuracy which increases linearly with the computational complexity, while the accuracy of the other methods grows logarithmically. For the Kolmogorov spectrum, a hybrid quadrature method is as efficient as the Fourier-wavelet method, if no more than eight decades of accuracy are required. The effectiveness of this hybrid method wanes when one samples fields whose energy spectrum decays more rapidly near the origin. The Fourier-wavelet method has roughly the same behavior independently of the exponent of the power law. The Fourier-wavelet method returns samples which are Gaussian over the range of values where the structure function is well approximated. By contrast, (multi-point) Gaussianity may be lost at the smaller length scales when one uses methods with random wave numbers. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 569
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] AN INVESTIGATION INTO RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT SAMPLING PROCEDURES
    KAYE, BH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE, 1962, 200 (08): : 603 - &
  • [3] Sampling from Gaussian Process Posteriors using Stochastic Gradient Descent
    Lin, Jihao Andreas
    Antoran, Javier
    Padhy, Shreyas
    Janz, David
    Hernandez-Lobato, Jose Miguel
    Terenin, Alexander
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [4] Independent sampling of a stochastic process
    Glynn, P
    Sigman, K
    [J]. STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 1998, 74 (02) : 151 - 164
  • [5] GAUSSIAN PROCESS ADAPTIVE IMPORTANCE SAMPLING
    Dalbey, Keith
    Swiler, Laura
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2014, 4 (02) : 133 - 149
  • [6] ROBUST GAUSSIAN STOCHASTIC PROCESS EMULATION
    Gu, Mengyang
    Wang, Xiaojing
    Berger, James O.
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2018, 46 (06): : 3069 - 3097
  • [7] Comparing the relative efficiency of three sequential procedures
    [J]. 2000, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, NY, USA (29):
  • [8] Relative efficiency of various sire evaluation procedures
    Aswathanaryana, T
    Govindaiah, MG
    Jayaprakash
    [J]. INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2003, 80 (06): : 550 - 553
  • [9] Comparing the relative efficiency of three sequential procedures
    Zoubeidi, T
    Chevre, C
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2000, 29 (02) : 511 - 521
  • [10] ON EFFICIENCIES OF STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURES UNDER IMPORTANCE SAMPLING
    Lam, Henry
    Jiang, Guangxin
    Fu, Michael C.
    [J]. 2018 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2018, : 1862 - 1873