A comparison between two modal domain methods for personal audio reproduction

被引:13
|
作者
Zhu, Qiaoxi [1 ]
Qiu, Xiaojun [1 ]
Coleman, Philip [2 ]
Burnett, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, Ctr Audio Acoust & Vibrat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Surrey, Inst Sound & Recording, Guildford, Surrey, England
来源
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA | 2020年 / 147卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
SOUND FIELD REPRODUCTION; IMPLEMENTATION; DECOMPOSITION; PREDICTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1121/10.0000474
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Personal audio provides private and personalized listening experiences by generating sound zones in a shared space with minimal interference between zones. One challenge of the design is to achieve the best performance with a limited number of microphones and loudspeakers. In this paper, two modal domain methods for personal audio reproduction are compared. One is the spatial harmonic decomposition (SHD) based method and the other is the singular value decomposition (SVD) based method. It is demonstrated that the SVD based method provides a more efficient modal domain decomposition than the SHD method for 2.5 dimensional personal audio design. Simulation results show that the SVD based method outperforms the SHD one by up to 10 dB in terms of acoustic contrast and up to 17 dB in terms of reproduction error for a compact arc array with five loudspeakers, while requiring fewer microphones around the zone boundaries. The SVD based method retains the inherent efficiency of optimizing in a modal domain while avoiding the inherent geometric limitations of using SHD basis functions. Thus, this approach is advantageous for applications with flexible system geometries and a small number of loudspeakers and microphones.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 173
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust Personal Audio Geometry Optimization in the SVD-Based Modal Domain
    Zhu, Qiaoxi
    Coleman, Philip
    Qiu, Xiaojun
    Wu, Ming
    Yang, Jun
    Burnett, Ian
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2019, 27 (03) : 610 - 620
  • [2] Comparison of 3d audio reproduction methods using hearing devices
    SIMON L.S.R.
    WÜTHRICH H.
    DILLIER N.
    SIMON, LAURENT S.R. (laurent.simon@usz.ch), 1600, Audio Engineering Society (68): : 899 - 909
  • [3] Comparison of 3D Audio Reproduction Methods Using Hearing Devices
    Simon, Laurent S. R.
    Wuethrich, Hannes
    Dillier, Norbert
    JOURNAL OF THE AUDIO ENGINEERING SOCIETY, 2020, 68 (12): : 899 - 909
  • [4] TIME DOMAIN MODAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION METHODS USED IN OMA: A COMPARISON
    Christensen, Silas Sverre
    Brandt, Anders
    8TH IOMAC INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE, 2019, : 507 - 509
  • [5] A comparison between modal differential substructure n method and conventional modal synthesis methods
    Mochizuki T.
    Hagiwara I.
    Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, C Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, 2010, 76 (763): : 525 - 532
  • [6] Comparison between methods for power system nonlinear modal analysis
    Wu, Fu-Xia
    Wu, Hao
    Han, Zhen-Xiang
    Gan, De-Qiang
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2007, 27 (34): : 19 - 25
  • [7] Comparison of Two Objective Methods of Quality Assessment for Digital Audio Broadcasting
    Rund, Frantisek
    Ulovec, Karel
    2018 28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE RADIOELEKTRONIKA (RADIOELEKTRONIKA), 2018,
  • [8] Robust personal audio reproduction based on acoustic transfer function modelling
    Zhu, Qiaoxi
    Coleman, Philip
    Wu, Ming
    Yang, Jun
    2016 AES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOUND FIELD CONTROL, 2016,
  • [9] A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MODAL PARAMETERS OBTAINED BY TWO DIFFERENT ACCELEROMETERS
    Cosmin, Miritoiu
    Dan, Ilincioiu
    Pablo, Jimenez Juan
    Catalin, Rosu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND EDUCATION (MSE 2011), VOL I, 2011, : 39 - 42
  • [10] COMPARISON OF MODAL COMBINATION METHODS
    GUPTA, AK
    CHEN, DC
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1984, 78 (01) : 53 - 68