Geographical risk of fatal and non-fatal injuries among adults in Norway

被引:4
|
作者
Andersen, Vegard [1 ]
Gurigard, Vilde Ravnsborg [1 ]
Holter, June Alette [1 ]
Wisborg, Torben [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Hlth Sci, Interprofess Rural Res Team, N-9600 Hammerfest, Norway
[2] Finnmark Hlth Trust, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Hammerfest Hosp, N-9613 Hammerfest, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Emergencies & Crit Care, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Trauma, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Fatal injury; non-fatal injury; fatality risk; epidemiology; rural areas; geography; PREHOSPITAL CARE; PEDIATRIC TRAUMA; URBAN AREAS; MORTALITY; DEATHS; POPULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2021.08.012
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: A rural gradient in trauma mortality disfavoring remote inhabitants is well known. Previous studies have shown higher risk of traumatic deaths in rural areas in Norway, combined with a paradoxically decreased prevalence of non-fatal injuries. We investigated the risk of fatal and severe non-fatal injuries among all adults in Norway during 2002-2016. Methods: All traumatic injuries and deaths among persons with a residential address in Norway from 2002-2016 were included. Data were collected from the Norwegian National Cause of Death Registry and the Norwegian Patient Registry. All cases were stratified into six groups of centrality based on Statistics Norway's classification system, from most urban (group one) to least urban/most rural (group six). Mortality and injury rates were calculated per 10 0,0 0 0 inhabitants per year. Results: The mortality rate differed significantly among the centrality groups (p < 0.05). The rate was 64.2 per 10 0,0 0 0 inhabitants/year in the most urban group and 78.6 per 10 0,0 0 0 inhabitants/year in the most rural group. The lowest mortality rate was found in centrality group 2 (57.9 per 10 0,0 0 0 inhabitants/year). For centrality group 6 versus group 2, the risk of death was increased (relative risk, 1.36; 95%CI: 1.11-1.66; p < 0.01). The most common causes of death were transport injury, self-harm, falls, and other external causes. The steepest urban-rural gradient was seen for transport injuries, with a relative risk of 3.32 (95%CI: 1.81-6.10; p < 0.001) for group 6 compared with group 1. There was a significantly increasing risk for severe non-fatal injuries from urban to rural areas. Group 2 had the lowest risk for non-fatal injuries (1531 per 10 0,0 0 0 inhabitants/year) and group 6 the highest (1803 per 10 0,0 0 0 inhabitants/year). The risk for non-fatal injuries increased with increasing rurality, with a relative risk of 1.07 (95%CI: 1.02-1.11; p < 0.01) for group 6 versus group 1. Conclusions: Fatal and non-fatal injury risks increased in parallel with increasing rurality. The lowest risk was in the second most urban region, followed by the most urban (capital) region, yielding a J-shaped risk curve. Transport injuries had the steepest urban-rural gradient. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:2855 / 2862
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disability and risk of non-fatal residential injuries among adults
    Vladutiu, C. J.
    Casteel, C.
    Runyan, C. W.
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2008, 14 (05) : 302 - 305
  • [2] Non-fatal injuries among adults with activity limitations and participation restrictions
    Xiang, H
    Leff, M
    Stallones, L
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2005, 11 (03) : 157 - 162
  • [3] The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults
    Stevens, J. A.
    Corso, P. S.
    Finkelstein, E. A.
    Miller, T. R.
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2006, 12 (05) : 290 - 295
  • [4] Fatal and non-fatal injuries caused by crossbows
    Grellner, W
    Buhmann, D
    Giese, A
    Gehrke, G
    Koops, E
    Püschel, K
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 142 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [5] Non-fatal injuries and the use of psychoactive drugs among young adults in Spain
    Regidor, E
    Barrio, G
    delaFuente, L
    Rodriguez, C
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1996, 40 (03) : 249 - 259
  • [6] A comparison of fatal with non-fatal knife injuries in Edinburgh
    Webb, E
    Wyatt, JP
    Henry, J
    Busuttil, A
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 99 (03) : 179 - 187
  • [7] The PMMA epidemic in Norway: Comparison of fatal and non-fatal intoxications
    Vevelstad, Merete
    Oiestad, Elisabeth Leere
    Middelkoop, Gerrit
    Hasvold, Inger
    Lilleng, Peer
    Delaveris, Gerd Jorunn M.
    Eggen, Tormod
    Morland, Jorg
    Arnestad, Marianne
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 219 (1-3)
  • [8] Differential ranking of causes of fatal versus non-fatal injuries among US children
    Ballesteros, MF
    Schieber, RA
    Gilchrist, J
    Holmgreen, P
    Annest, JL
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2003, 9 (02) : 173 - 176
  • [9] Is it safe on deck? Fatal and non-fatal workplace injuries among Alaskan commercial fishermen
    Thomas, TK
    Lincoln, JM
    Husberg, BJ
    Conway, GA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2001, 40 (06) : 693 - 702
  • [10] Gender differences for non-fatal unintentional fall related injuries among older adults
    Stevens, JA
    Sogolow, ED
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2005, 11 (02) : 115 - 119