The prognostic significance of optimal debulking in the setting of a complete clinical response for advanced ovarian carcinoma patients receiving maintenance chemotherapy

被引:4
|
作者
Abaid, Lisa N. [1 ]
Goldstein, Bram H. [1 ]
Lopez, Katrina L. [2 ]
Micha, John P. [1 ]
Brown, John V., III [1 ]
Rettenmaier, Mark A. [1 ]
Markman, Maurie [3 ]
机构
[1] Gynecol Oncol Associates, Hoag Canc Ctr, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA
[2] Womens Canc Res Fdn, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Gynecologic oncology; Maintenance chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Surgical debulking; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; SURGICAL CYTOREDUCTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; STAGE-III; CANCER; PACLITAXEL; CISPLATIN; SURVIVAL; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-010-1571-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim We investigated if optimal surgical debulking increases tumor responsiveness to maintenance chemotherapy and improves survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients who previously attained a clinical complete response (CCR) to primary chemotherapy. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed 75 advanced ovarian cancer patients, of whom 43 and 32 underwent optimal versus suboptimal cytoreduction, respectively. All patients exhibited a CCR following 6 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin and subsequently received maintenance chemotherapy (paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2); q21 days). Results The median progression free survival (PFS) for the optimally debulked patients was 35 months, compared to 20 months for the suboptimal population (P = 0.003). Moreover, a Cox model analysis revealed that an increased number of maintenance chemotherapy cycles and optimal surgical reduction significantly correlated with favorable patient PFS (P < 0.001). In regard to overall survival (OS), the patients who had optimal cytoreductive surgery exhibited improved OS results compared to the sub-optimal surgery group (42 vs. 27 months; P < 0.001). However, a Cox model analysis indicated that a greater number of maintenance chemotherapy cycles was a surrogate marker for improved OS (P < 0.001), but surgery type was not (P > 0.05). Duration of overall patient follow-up exceeds 41 months. Conclusion In advanced ovarian cancer patients who achieve a CCR following induction chemotherapy, optimal cytoreduction may confer a greater clinical benefit from a maintenance approach compared to suboptimal cytoreduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1131
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The prognostic significance of optimal debulking in the setting of a complete clinical response for advanced ovarian carcinoma patients receiving maintenance chemotherapy
    Lisa N. Abaid
    Bram H. Goldstein
    Katrina L. Lopez
    John P. Micha
    John V. Brown
    Mark A. Rettenmaier
    Maurie Markman
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 283 : 1127 - 1131
  • [2] Prognostic Significance of Chemotherapy Response Score in Patients Undergoing Interval Debulking Surgery and Attained Complete Cytoreduction for High-Grade Serous Tubal and Ovarian Carcinoma
    Santhamma, Anjana J.
    Sambasivan, Suchetha
    Mohanan, Simi C.
    Nair, Rema Prabhakaran
    Ranjith, J. Siva
    James, Francis V.
    Zachariah, Reba Ann
    Nair, Jagathnath Krishna K. Mohanan
    SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024,
  • [3] Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma
    Giannopoulos, T
    Butler-Manuel, S
    Taylor, A
    Ngeh, N
    Thomas, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 27 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [4] OPTIMAL DEBULKING FOLLOWING CHEMOTHERAPY OF ADVANCED-STAGE EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA
    PIURA, B
    GLEZERMAN, M
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 40 (04) : 237 - 240
  • [5] THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL DEBULKING ON THE RESPONSE OF PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN-CARCINOMA TO CHEMOTHERAPY
    MCDERMOTT, DF
    JAFFE, EA
    COLEMAN, M
    PASMANTIER, MW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1988, 11 (05): : 520 - 523
  • [6] Clinical significance of primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy-interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Nishio, Shin
    Ushijima, Kimio
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [7] Prognostic significance of pretreatment clinical and laboratory features in patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Sekmek, Serhat
    Bayram, Dogan
    Efil, Safa Can
    Ucar, Gokhan
    Sendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit
    Kos, Fahriye Tugba
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [8] Prognostic significance of postoperative morbidities in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed primary surgical debulking
    Le, Tien
    Alshaikh, Ghadeer
    Hopkins, Laura
    Faught, Wylam
    Fung, Michael Kee Fung
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (12) : 1711 - 1716
  • [9] Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Morbidities in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Delayed Primary Surgical Debulking
    Tien Le
    Ghadeer Alshaikh
    Laura Hopkins
    Wylam Faught
    Michael Fung Kee Fung
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2006, 13 : 1711 - 1716
  • [10] Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Chang, Suk-Joon
    Bristow, Robert E.
    Ryu, Hee-Sug
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 126 (03) : 381 - 386