Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives

被引:133
|
作者
Boivin, Antoine [1 ]
Currie, Kay [2 ]
Fervers, Beatrice [3 ]
Gracia, Javier [4 ]
James, Marian [5 ]
Marshall, Catherine
Sakala, Carol [6 ]
Sanger, Sylvia [7 ]
Strid, Judi [8 ]
Thomas, Victoria [9 ]
van der Weijden, Trudy [10 ]
Grol, Richard [1 ]
Burgers, Jako [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Med, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Natl Hlth & Med Res Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Lyon, Ctr Leon Berard, Lyon, France
[4] Unidad Evaluac Tecnol Sanitarias, Madrid, Spain
[5] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Childbirth Connect, New York, NY USA
[7] Agcy Qual Med, Berlin, Germany
[8] Natl Consumer Advocacy Serv, Auckland, New Zealand
[9] Natl Inst Hlth & Clin Excellence, London, England
[10] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2010年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
DECISION AIDS; HEALTH-CARE; PREFERENCES; PARTICIPATION; PROGRAMS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2009.034835
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are important tools for improving patient care. Patient and public involvement is recognised as an essential component of CPG development and implementation, The Guideline International Network Patient and Public Involvement Working Group (G-I-N PUBLIC) aims to support the development, implementation and evaluation of guideline-oriented patient and public involvement programmes (PPIPs). Objective To develop an international practice and research agenda on patient and public involvement in CPG. Method 56 CPG developers, researchers, and patient/public representatives from 14 different countries, were consulted in an international workshop. Recommendations were validated with G-I-N PUBLIC steering committee members. Results Many CPG organisations have set up PPIPs that use a range of participation, consultation and communication methods. Current PPIPs aim to improve the quality and responsiveness of CPGs to public expectations and needs, or to foster individual healthcare decisions. Some organisations use structured involvement methods, including providing training for patient and public representatives. A number of financial, organisational and sociopolitical barriers limit patient and public involvement. The paucity of process and impact evaluations limits our current understanding of the conditions under which patient and public involvement is most likely to be effective. Conclusion Greater international collaboration and research are needed to strengthen existing knowledge, development and evaluation of patient and public involvement in CPG.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] International perspectives on patient involvement in clinical trials in nephrology
    Banerjee, Debasish
    Lowe-Jones, Racquel
    Damster, Sandrine
    Thomas, Nicola
    Scholes-Robertson, Nicole
    Tong, Allison
    Levin, Adeera
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 98 (03) : 566 - 571
  • [2] Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review
    Bryant, Elizabeth Ann
    Scott, Anna Mae
    Greenwood, Hannah
    Thomas, Rae
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [3] EXPERIENCES OF BEING A PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT REPRESENTATIVE FOR CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY RESEARCH
    Wells, Ruth
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 : 8 - 8
  • [4] Achieving effective patient and public involvement in international clinical trials in neurology
    Tallantyre, Emma C.
    Evangelou, Nikos
    Bale, Clare
    Chaudhry, Burhan Z.
    Gray, Emma H.
    LaRocca, Nicholas
    Pavitt, Sue
    Miller, Deborah M.
    Planchon, Sarah M.
    Ontaneda, Daniel
    Manzano, Ana
    [J]. NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 10 (03) : 265 - 272
  • [5] Patient and Public Involvement in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Knowledge Synthesis of Existing Programs
    Legare, France
    Boivin, Antoine
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Pakenham, Christine
    Burgers, Jako
    Legare, Jean
    St-Jacques, Sylvie
    Gagnon, Susie
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2011, 31 (06) : E45 - E74
  • [6] A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
    France Légaré
    Antoine Boivin
    Trudy van der Weijden
    Christine Packenham
    Sylvie Tapp
    Jako Burgers
    [J]. Implementation Science, 4
  • [7] Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review protocol
    Bryant, Elizabeth Ann
    Scott, Anna Mae
    Thomas, Rae
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [8] A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
    Legare, France
    Boivin, Antoine
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Packenham, Christine
    Tapp, Sylvie
    Burgers, Jako
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [9] Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment: update of a systematic review of international experiences
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Dipankui, Mylene Tantchou
    Poder, Thomas G.
    Payne-Gagnon, Julie
    Mbemba, Gisele
    Beretta, Valentina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 37 (01)
  • [10] Knowing what to do: International perspectives on the roles of clinical guidelines and patient preferences in patient care
    Brennan, PF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1998, 5 (03) : 317 - 318