Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Diminished Criminal Responsibility as "New Evidence" in Criminal Revision Procedures

被引:2
|
作者
Rassin, Eric [1 ]
Boskovic, Irena [2 ]
Merckelbach, Harald [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
forensic science; posttraumatic stress disorder; psychiatry; psychology; expert-witnesses; behavioral science; RELIABILITY; CONFLICT; PTSD;
D O I
10.1111/1556-4029.13789
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may affect victims of crime, but may also be reported by offenders. In the postappeal phase, offenders may claim to suffer from chronic PTSD and argue that this indicates diminished criminal responsibility at the time the index crime was committed. As members of a Dutch criminal cases review commission, we recently encountered two cases in which PTSD was presented as new evidence that would justify a reopening of the case. In this article, we argue that such claims are problematic in that clinical decision making resulting in a PTSD diagnosis adheres to quite different standards than those dictating forensic fact-finding. The two cases illustrate the difference between criminal and clinical fact-finding.
引用
收藏
页码:1911 / 1913
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条