Interaction between chicken intestinal microbiota and protein digestion

被引:182
|
作者
Apajalahti, J. [1 ]
Vienola, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alimetrics Ltd, Koskelontie 19B, Espoo 02920, Finland
关键词
Broiler chicken; Protein digestion; Intestinal microbes; Amino acid assimilation; Microbial protein; Endogenous losses; Putrefaction; Protein fermentation; Biogenic amines; Indole; Ammonia; Protease; PIG FECAL BACTERIA; CLOSTRIDIUM-PERFRINGENS; BROILER-CHICKENS; NUTRITIONAL-REQUIREMENTS; MIXED POPULATIONS; AMINO-ACIDS; METABOLISM; CECUM; INDOLE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.004
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The different sections of the broiler chicken intestinal tract are inhabited by specialist micro biota adapted to the physicochemical conditions, host physiology and available nutrients of the specific habitat. The small intestine is dominated by lactic acid bacteria which have complex nutrient requirements resembling those of the chicken host itself. Lactobacilli are unable to synthesise amino acids for their anabolism and are therefore highly dependent on amino acid availability in the growth environment. Thus, in the small intestine there is competition for amino acids between the microbiota and the chicken host. According to rough estimates, lactobacilli in the small intestine may assimilate 3-6% of total dietary amino acids. If the protein is highly digestible and amino acids are largely absorbed in the upper small intestine, where bacterial growth is suppressed, the proportion captured by the host may be higher. Exogenous enzymes which promote protein digestion are also likely to provide a competitive advantage to the chicken, offering less growth potential for amino acid-dependent bacteria. Protein escaping the ileum comprises resistant protein of dietary origin, protein assimilated to intestinal bacteria and endogenous protein synthesised and secreted by the host, the latter synthesised in host tissues from dietary amino acids and thus representing true endogenous protein. Activities of small intestinal bacteria affect the size of the microbial protein fraction and also the production of endogenous proteins originating from mucin, epithelial cells and antibodies. Ileal bypass protein is subject to fermentation by putrefactive bacteria in the caecum. Putrefaction produces many harmful and toxic compounds, which in high concentrations may have adverse effects on chicken growth and performance. The protein fermentation products include amines, indoles, phenols, cresol and ammonia, which can all negatively affect host or cell health. All actions to reduce the amount of ileal bypass protein potentially also reduce production of toxic protein fermentation metabolites in the caecum. Enzymes which facilitate protein digestion in the upper intestine and soluble carbohydrates resistant to ileal digestion both reduce caecal putrefaction. In the distal intestine, saccharolytic fermentation is preferred and putrefaction accelerates only when utilisable carbohydrates are depleted. Soluble oligo-and polysaccharides are produced in situ by non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzymes and can also be added directly to the diet as health-promoting prebiotics. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 330
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An interaction between intestinal IgA and intestinal microbiota
    Shinkura, Reiko
    [J]. GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2016, 91 (06) : 336 - 336
  • [2] Contributions of the Interaction Between Dietary Protein and Gut Microbiota to Intestinal Health
    Ma, Ning
    Tian, Yanan
    Wu, Yi
    Ma, Xi
    [J]. CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE, 2017, 18 (08) : 795 - 808
  • [3] Interaction between the Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Motility
    Liu, Qihong
    Luo, Yunfeng
    Ke, Xiao
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [4] The Interaction Between Viruses and Intestinal Microbiota: A Review
    Zhiming Lv
    Dongwei Xiong
    Jichao Shi
    Miao Long
    Zeliang Chen
    [J]. Current Microbiology, 2021, 78 : 3597 - 3608
  • [5] The Interaction Between Celiac Disease and Intestinal Microbiota
    Losurdo, Giuseppe
    Principi, Mariabeatrice
    Iannone, Andrea
    Ierardi, Enzo
    Di Leo, Alfredo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 50 : S145 - S147
  • [6] The Interaction Between Viruses and Intestinal Microbiota: A Review
    Lv, Zhiming
    Xiong, Dongwei
    Shi, Jichao
    Long, Miao
    Chen, Zeliang
    [J]. CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (10) : 3597 - 3608
  • [7] Interaction between food homologous plants and intestinal microbiota
    Kulyar, Muhammad Fakhar-e-Alam
    Zou, Wen
    Lu, Sijia
    Loon, Kyein San
    Akhtar, Muhammad
    Ihsan, Awais
    Nawaz, Shah
    Ahmed, Ahmed Ezzat
    Abdelrahman, Mohamed
    Wu, Yi
    Iqbal, Mujahid
    Li, Kun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] Interaction between microbiota and immune in intestinal inflammatory diseases
    Nie, Kai
    Yang, Shiming
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [9] Interaction between food components, intestinal microbiota and intestinal mucosa as a function of intestinal health
    Venema, K
    Van de Sandt, H
    [J]. AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2003, 14 (02): : 62 - 66
  • [10] Interaction between intestinal mycobiota and microbiota shapes lung inflammation
    Wang, Youxia
    He, Fang
    Liu, Bingnan
    Wu, Xiaoyan
    Han, Ziyi
    Wang, Xuefei
    Liao, Yuexia
    Duan, Jielin
    Ren, Wenkai
    [J]. IMETA, 2024,