Automatic detection of quality soil spectra in an online vis-NIR soil sensor

被引:0
|
作者
Guerrero, Angela [1 ]
Javadi, S. Hamed M. [2 ]
Mouazen, Abdul M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Environm, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Interuniv Microelect Ctr IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Online soil sensor; Visible and near infrared spectroscopy; Automatic filtering; Machine learning; NEAR-INFRARED-SPECTROSCOPY; ON-THE-GO; ORGANIC-CARBON; MOISTURE-CONTENT; DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS; IN-SITU; PREDICTION; FIELD; FERTILIZATION; LIBRARIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2022.106857
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The quality of online visible and near infrared (vis-NIR) soil spectra can be deteriorated by interferences of ambient light, and debris e.g., stones, roots or plant residues among others, which considerably reduces the accuracy of the predictions. Filtering of very noisy and non-soil spectra from good-quality soil spectra needs to be performed prior the modelling. Nevertheless, manual filtering of the large amount of vis-NIR online measurement is a laborious and time-consuming task. This study was conducted to develop an automatic filtering system of very noisy and non-soil spectra. Soil and non-soil spectra obtained during online vis-NIR measurements in four commercial fields in Flanders, Belgium were used to build two databases. The main difference in the databases is that flat spectra, mostly found in wet soil conditions, were considered as non-soil spectra in the first group and as soil spectra in the second group. Similarity algorithms [i.e., Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, Euclidian distance, cosine distance and principal component analysis (PCA)] and machine learning algorithms (i.e., linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine and K-nearest neighbors) for spectra filtering using the two databases were evaluated and compared. Results suggest that the similarity algorithms were not successful to classify spectra into soil and non-soil classes for both groups, since the best prediction accuracy in cross validation achieved by the cosine distance algorithm was 76.11%. However, the machine learning algorithms provided high classification accuracies for both databases. For the former database, the best classification result of 98.5% in cross-validation and 98.6% in independent validation was obtained by using the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. While for the latter database, the best result was achieved by the support vector machine algorithm with a gaussian kernel obtaining 81.4% in cross-validation and 82.03% in independent validation. The best performing model was used to build a cleaning function to automatically pre-process and classify spectra into soil or non-soil classes. This automatic spectrum filtering system enables time saving and ensures only high-quality spectra are used for accurate online prediction of soil properties, necessary for sensor-based variable rate applications.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A soil quality index using Vis-NIR and pXRF spectra of a soil profile
    Gozukara, Gafur
    Acar, Mert
    Ozlu, Ekrem
    Dengiz, Orhan
    Hartemink, Alfred E.
    Zhang, Yakun
    [J]. CATENA, 2022, 211
  • [2] Evaluation of soil structural quality using VIS-NIR spectra
    Askari, Mohammad Sadegh
    Cui, Junfang
    O'Rourke, Sharon M.
    Holden, Nicholas M.
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2015, 146 : 108 - 117
  • [3] Estimating soil texture from vis-NIR spectra
    Hobley, E. U.
    Prater, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2019, 70 (01) : 83 - 95
  • [4] Assessment of soil quality using VIS-NIR spectra in invaded coastal wetlands
    Yang, Ren-Min
    Wang, Liang-Jie
    Chen, Liu-Mei
    Zhang, Zhong-Qi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 81 (01)
  • [5] Fusion of Vis-NIR and XRF spectra for estimation of key soil attributes
    Javadi, S. Hamed
    Munnaf, Muhammad Abdul
    Mouazen, Abdul M.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2021, 385
  • [6] Using Wavelets to Analyse Proximally Sensed Vis-NIR Soil Spectra
    Rossel, R. A. Viscarra
    Lark, R. M.
    Ortega, A. S.
    [J]. PROXIMAL SOIL SENSING, 2010, : 201 - +
  • [7] Fuzzy clustering of Vis-NIR spectra for the objective recognition of soil morphological horizons in soil profiles
    Fajardo, Mario
    McBratney, Alex
    Whelan, Brett
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2016, 263 : 244 - 253
  • [8] Distance and similarity-search metrics for use with soil vis-NIR spectra
    Ramirez-Lopez, L.
    Behrens, T.
    Schmidt, K.
    Rossel, R. A. Viscarra
    Dematte, J. A. M.
    Scholten, T.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2013, 199 : 43 - 53
  • [9] SOIL VIS-NIR SPECTRA AND FUZZY K-MEANS ON DEFINITION OF SOIL MAPPING UNITS IN TOPOSSEQUENCES
    Rizzo, Rodnei
    Dematte, Jose A. M.
    Coelho Lacerda, Marilusa Pinto
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2015, 39 (06): : 1533 - 1543
  • [10] Soil Moisture Measurement Sensor Research in Seeding Ditch Based on VIS-NIR
    Zhang D.
    Liu J.
    Yang L.
    Cui T.
    He X.
    Zhang T.
    [J]. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52 (02): : 218 - 226